I was out walking with my new gun dogs, Bessy and Katie. Bessy is a springer and never still, she’ll be excellent for a bit of rough shooting working her way down a hedge, but far too impatient for grouse or pheasant on a formal shoot. Katie on the other hand is a retriever and as solid as a rock, but today we’re just out for the exercise and to get used to each other. Both were calm because there was no gun, so they knew they weren’t working. Alan their previous owner was a friend of mine and his widow kept the dogs for me because he said before he died that’s what he wanted. I haven’t seen them since they were pups, but they seem to regard me as an old friend. Probably the smell of gun oil on my jacket helps.
We stopped for a bite and after I gave the dogs a ham sandwich each, I’d made two just for them, I used the binoculars. I could see a track laying back actor machine on the moorland on the other side of the valley which seemed to be installing anti rain run offs to raise the water table and reinstate the wetland, they’re doing that on Skidaw in Cumbria as well as all over the Highlands of Scotland.
There are grouse in the distance. They probably don’t realise the grouse will disappear as the sphagnum swells and holds more water. They probably think they can have the best of all worlds, or they don’t think at all.
The raptor over head is not a peregrine, probably a goshawk from the flight pattern. Gossies are like sparrow hawks with an attitude problem on steroids, but I love them. I hunt with peregrines at home. There are too many raptors here in the UK. To have a top of the food chain predator dominating the landscape is unsustainable. Raptors are everywhere now in Britain due to the legislation protecting them and the well intentioned idiots feeding them. They will have to continue feeding them or thousands will die as the land is now carrying far more than it will support. Breeding sites are at such a premium now that the competition for them is becoming deadly, so unfortunately thousands of raptors will die even if they do keep feeding them.
At home such matters are controlled by us, the landowners, and we understand the differences between conservation and preservation. Put in a nutshell, if you’ll pardon the irresistible phrase, conservationists maintain a healthy population of squirrels, their food supply and their predators. Preservationist would save every last squirrel till they all starved to death because their food supply was exhausted. Juan says they’d preserve them in olive oil in jars.
That’s what happens when you give a city kid a degree in conservation, and then the authority to control a landscape, a kid whose only experience of wildlife is the ducks in the local park. A friend told me in her letter a few months ago that the newly appointed local small mammal officer for the national park she lives in had admitted to her that he’d never laid eyes on a pygmy shrew. She told him her cats bought in half a dozen a week. These bits of kids with the ink still wet on their qualifications just don’t understand death is part of a bigger picture and letting all the weaklings breed is doing neither their species nor any other any favours.
In my book the principle should be applied to people too. There are all too few like me. When I was pregnant with my first, the test shewed I was carrying a Downs syndrome. I wanted a termination, but the quack said it was too late to abort, I’d have to have it. By the time I discovered he was wrong it was too late. 'Fine, I’ll put it up for adoption,' I told them. When asked why I think my reasoning shocked them. I told them, ‘You are the ones who won’t let me get rid of it so you arrange for it to be looked after, housed and kept, or let someone else put themself into penury for something that will never contribute to society, because I’m damned if you’re forcing me into any of those things, and I wouldn’t consider it if I lived with a man either.’ They expected me to make provision for its care. Folly. I’d had it with the NHS, so I was delivered at home by a obstetrician paid by me, and there was an incubator and an ambulance ready to take it away. I never laid eyes on it. I’d inherited the family home and estate, and the government had forced me to sell the lot as a result of death duties. I wasn’t poverty stricken, and I’d no intention of becoming so. Twenty-two million the government had taken, surely to god they can take care of the matter with that?
Two weeks after giving birth I moved to Patagonia. All had been ready for months, all that I wanted to take with me including all my financial assets had been transferred weeks before. I met Juan at a shoot not long after moving, and we were married six weeks later. Between us we bought what would be half a county in England, and we look after it. We built a huge property, sixty-two suits of rooms beside the family wing and the estate workers' rooms, and the shoots pay for all. It functions like a hotel, but looks and feels like a private country mansion. It’s so popular that folk come to shoot from all over the world, and we need more room, but Juan thinks to extend the property would detract from its appeal, so we are building another property half as big again thirty miles away, but it’s still on the estate. The farm land is in excellent heart, getting better every year, and every year it provides more employment than the last.
My old home has fallen into disrepair, and is shortly to be demolished. The land is no longer looked after properly. Half the topsoil has disappeared, blown away as dust, and the rest will be gone soon. The tree huggers stopped the raising of game which was what paid for the estate maintenance and provided work for thirty odd full time staff and hundreds of part timers. No one works there now. Where once the dung and bedding straw from the dairy herds nourished the land, now only artificial fertilisers are applied by huge tractors operated by contractors. The cows are gone, apparently they didn’t provide enough dividends for the shareholders. The humus has gone from the soil, and every year more artificial fertiliser has to be applied to get a lesser crop than the year before. But what do I know? My family had only been at it eight hundred years.
I’m only back to pick up Bessie and Katie and a couple of good Clumber pups. We’re all flying back tonight before anyone realises I’ve been here. Juan and four beautiful healthy children are awaiting me back home. Brutal? Maybe, but that’s the reality I live with. Just at the moment I’m three months pregnant with a healthy daughter. But if there had been anything wrong with it I'd have terminated the pregnancy and tried again. Juan and I are shooting for six and next time will be just the same. I’m not telling anyone else how to live, but I’ll be damned before I let anyone tell me how to live either.
After this trip I can’t see me ever returning. It’s too depressing, and anyway we’ve got enough quality dogs to breed our own now. The best way to improve your stock is line breeding from the best, but of course that concentrates poor traits as well as good ones. No problem. You just have to cull any inferior stock. The best thing I ever did was get the hell out of Britain. Like I said, There are too many raptors. They’re dominating the landscape and the political landscape too. They're running the bloody country too, right down into the ground, and they all need regular handouts to survive too, but they’ve already had more than their pound of flesh from me.
Comments
Provocative, but I'm sure that was your intent.
Good points about land management but when it comes to people there's such a thing as being too utilitarian, especially when you're not the one who gets to decide who's fit and deserving to exist. There's plenty of people who assume they can predict what is and isn't an advantageous trait for millennia down the road (according to some romanticized notion of tough-guy pseudo-Darwinism) and who would cull the transgender for the supposed betterment of the species; discounting the social aspects of human behavior---our interdependency and i dare say even our kindness---that may have played a big part in our survival so far...
But it's consistent with your narrator's whole gig and---as always---your story gives food for thought....
~hugs, Veronica
What borders on stupidity?
Canada and Mexico.
.
Too utilitarian?
'when it comes to people there's such a thing as being too utilitarian' is not a fact, it's an opinion. An opinion many would disagree with. I would defend your right to hold that opinion, and I would equally defend the right of those who disagree with you to hold that opinion too.
Regards,
Eolwaen
Eolwaen
Opinions about human worth
It's all shits and giggles until people start getting herded into boxcars...
~mutual regards, Veronica
(which is just an example of too utilitarian,
and not saying I agree with those who feel they have
the right to force women to have babies against their will; VP Mike Pen-is et al.)
What borders on stupidity?
Canada and Mexico.
.
Boxcars
Indeed, but still I would defend both sides in their rights to hold an opinion. Doing something about it is a whole different story. The thought police are the thin edge of an equally dangerous wedge, because they believe their thoughts are more equal than those of any who thinks differently.
Regards,
Eolwaen
Eolwaen
Middle
I'm somewhere in the middle of the above discussion.
Humans have value as individuals. The whole herding of people into boxcars that was done by a certain past despot is the antithesis of civilized society.
But if one were to argue that we absolutely must remove the defective, doing so prenatally is the best solution.
But, like I said, humans and animals are not the same. There is a difference in kind.
Humans have value as individuals. Animals (and plants) are part of the ecology, and should be managed with the rest of it -- or they should be allowed to evolve and change like they have for the past three billion years or so.
Of course, some animals have value as individuals. I'm talking about our pets, of course. We love them and treat them like family.
Domestic animals have economic value. Maybe they are sold, maybe they are used as beasts of burden or decoration, or maybe they are harvested to feed the family.
Patagonia
I had heard the name, but it's one of the rare times I had to google it to find out where it is. The results only contained info about a company by that name. I refined the search and found out that it's not a country at all. It's the southern tip of South America from about 40 degrees south latitude down, and is shared between Argentina and Chile. It sounds like an interesting place to live.
While I'm not a fan of abortion, I find the rest of it to be right on. If we are to take care of the ecology, we need to work wit evolution, not short circuit it.
There are a bunch of mutant stunted deer with white patches on Belle Isle, which is accessed via a bridge from downtown Detroit. The local restaurants dump scraps on the road for them.
I wouldn't be surprised if the local government were to pay professionals good taxpayer money to trap and either euthanize of relocate the animals. Meanwhile, if a regular subject -- I mean citizen were to harvest one to feed his hungry family, he would catch hell from the guv'mint.
If they want to reduce the population -- something that NEEDS To be done -- they need to sell a bunch of bow hunting licenses for a hundred bucks a piece to people who have passed the hunter's safety course. They would have plenty of takers, and lots of families would be fed. And the guv'mint would have even more money to waste.
Instead, they will be wasted or released into the wild where they are ill equipped to survive. How humane is that?
One might be tempted to trap some of the wolves that are causing so much trouble in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and release them on that island.
Wild horses
There is a range of hills in Wales called the Black Mountains, which all farms that have a border with have grazing rights on. Back in 1976 (I've no idea what the situation is now) there was a herd of wild horses (technically I think they'd be ponies due to lack of height) that had been on the mountain for generations. Every so often some were rounded up to be sold at Llanybydder Horse Mart. The problem was no one could ride one because they had congenital hip dysplasia, some in one hip but many in both. Result they were all bought by the traders from Belgium for 'Breakfast bacon'. Then the bleeding heart brigade discovered what was going on and went to huge efforts to buy and 'save' them. I've no idea how or even if the problem were resolved, it may be the same today.
As for abortion. I've never been in the position of having to consider it, for which I am truly grateful, so I do not think it appropriate to have an opinion on. I know women who've been there, some had the child, some had the abortion. None were unaffected by the consequences. It would be a hard woman indeed that were not, but for me theirs is the decision to make and no one else.
We live in a secular society here in the UK. Religion plays no part in most peoples' lives. It is one aspect of the US that completely baffles most of us. Personally I'm not bothered by it, but I can't take it seriously, or any argument that uses it for any purpose whatsoever. I'm a cynic and the moment someone pull a bible on me I take a firm grip on my handbag [purse]. Sweden and Denmark had no Down children born last year and regard it as a medical and social triumph. They live there not me, so it's their call. There are many who would disagree that animals and humans are fundamentally different. They would argue that humans are merely the top predator which makes it an opinion not a fact. The moment someone says I don't agree both sides are expressing an opinion.
Regards,
Eolwaen
Eolwaen
Line Breeding
Line breeding is what happens in my barn. In breeding is what happens in your barn.
Yeah, line breeding has to be done with care, and it implies that we will take care of the resultant monoculture because the animals (or plants) will no longer be suitable for release into the wild. But then, how many of our multitude of breeds of 'man's best friend' would make it in the wild, anyhow? Certainly not the pug.
A really good example of line breeding done wrong is the plethora of dogs with hip displasia. They hobble around later in life because that trait wasn't bred out. Their ancestors were just too cute to be culled.
By the way, culling doesn't mean killing the animals. It means not allowing them to breed. It doesn't cost much to spay or neuter.
Down and immunization
Around 1973 the number of babies born with down started rising. There has been more than a 30 percent rise in babies born with down. Our healthy lifestyle is killing our future.
hugs
Barb
Oklahoma born and raised cowgirl
Midwives
Within my life time, in the really poorer areas of the highlands and islands of Scotland, when a woman gave birth the midwife put the baby to one side, made the mother comfortable, a euphamism if ever I heard one, and then saw to the baby. Unless of course the baby would require more help than such a poor community could afford and it would put others at risk. It was never talked about, but I suppose it was a rough and ready quality control. In my own culture in the high arctic there were always the wolves, again in my lifetime. It is uncomfortable for most to talk about and many become heated, but those folk back then, and I doubt it has completely ended, could only aspire to what is now called poverty. My thought is till you've been there you don't have a right to vilify such actions.
As to Down babies going up in numbers, I have been led to believe it followed the age of motherhood going up, women getting education before starting a family. I know older mothers are more at risk, but I stand to be corrected on what I was led to believe.
Regards,
Eolwaen
Eolwaen
The track layer
There were a lot of points made and the only one I would argue with is the one who said people are separate from ecology. Humans are subject to everything the so called lesser species are and our manipulations of our environment give us advantages over most other lifeforms on Earth and might just kill all of us or maybe just some or most of us. All I'm sure of is anyone who is sure they know best is probably wrong.
Time is the longest distance to your destination.
Siteseer
I agree entirely with you Siteseer, now there's a first, not really, but certainly it's a rarity. If, or maybe it's when, a mass extinction event were to occur I'm certain humans would not be exempt due to their superiority as a species. There is a view that our success as a species is going to be our doom simply because we occupy too great a proportion of the planet's biomass, and as that process continues -accelerates?- the complexity of the food webs will decrease to a point beyond viability. Life would I'm sure reestablish itself, but humans? Who knows.
Regards,
Eolwaen
Eolwaen
Three days
All in all it really does not matter what you have for an opinion on whether one with a problem lives or dies. Me personally until they can fix genetic problems we will have kids with those problems. War did more to cull out the weak and kept the burdens to a minimum. We no longer war and when we do we have rules that must be followed.
So once the electronic world fails and the power goes out we will all have three days to become stronger than everyone else, because in those three days you will run out of food and clean water. Those who still know how to treat the land might survive if there is enough of them, but with corporate run farms they will be few and far between. If the entire community does not prep for this than the one prepper if know is the biggest target.
We are all hunters and only comfort is keeping us from being the hunter or the hunted.
Three days to Chaos, three days until society dies once the trucks stop rolling.
I mean seriously many people ate chicken today that was raised in the US sent to be butchered in China and then shipped back to the States.
Emotion, yet peace.
Ignorance, yet knowledge.
Passion, yet serenity.
Chaos, yet harmony.
Contemplation, yet duty
Death, yet the Force.
Light with dark, I remain Balanced.
When it hits the fan
I recognise the chicken situation. The EU catch prawns, fly them to China to be shucked, and then they are flown back. A few years ago (1986 I think) there was a case in The Netherlands where the prawns had a forbidden bacterial contamination (I can't recall what). It was illegal under EU regulations at the time to irradiate food with Xrays to kill the bacteria. So they were yet again flown to China to be irradiated, and then back to the Netherlands for consumption because it was not illegal to sell irradiated food!
Modern food and commodities delivery systems are incrdibly sophisticated computer managed systems. A friend who lives in Alaska tells me the US supply chain is the most sophisticated in the world - when it works. She also says it it the lousiest in the world when it fouls up as it does often for Alaskans.
As a child I heard someone speculate that there would come a day when people would go to war over the world's most precious resource, potable water. He was scoffed at, for such a thing was unthinkable just after WWII. That came to pass decades ago, and the way it seems in the media with regard to the water levels of the Colorado US citizens' biggest concern won't be Mexicans but each other.
I have a series of tales, part of Castle, but after the main events. They concern the following incursion of 619, by which time Earth has almost hit the bottom of its the descent into chaos during which folk mainly survived by eating each other. With a now vastly reduced population , the tale concerns the difficult climb out of chaos that one particular group of folk undertook as related by one of them. He concludes that Earth is now a little behind Castle in its development.
However, I suspect that if it hits the fan events will be beyond what any of us could have imagined.
Regards,
Eolwaen
Eolwaen