By Daphne Xu
Part III -- Other Participants' Stories
One of the witnesses in the rape/murder case against Chester Caveman lived in a single room across the hall from Chester. Originally, he was a prosecution witness, because he'd seen Debby storming out of Chester's room and down the hallway towards the stairs. He'd been the last to see her before her body was found inside the trash bin.
However, he turned out to be an excellent defense witness, even though the facts were established through cross examination during the prosecution's case in chief.
The witness had exclaimed, "Debby!" as she ran by him toward the stairs. He stopped and watched as she entered the stairwell, and then entered his room. Chester never left his room while the witness was in the hallway, and the witness never heard him or anyone running down the hallway the rest of that evening.
He discovered after the case, that the defense attorney had used his testimony to establish that the boyfriend didn't chase after the girlfriend. If Chester had simply walked, he would never have caught up with her.
He himself was convinced that Chester had nothing to do with Debby's rape and murder, although Chester was a major asshole and sometimes violent towards his girlfriends.
One day, he saw on the news that Chester's dead body was discovered in an alley. Media commentators were gleeful about his murder. "That, my friends, is the way to deal with crime!"
A couple days later, the witness was walking back to the campus from an off-campus function, when he suddenly felt dizzy and faint, and felt himself falling to the ground.
The Holdout Juror's Story
The one juror who'd insisted on voting for the defendant's innocence was truly amazed at everything that happened in the trial. Not only was the case against the boyfriend garbage, he couldn't get through to any of the other jurors. They all wanted to convict so they could go home and sleep easily. They were all the more influenced by the horrible crime, then by the fact that there was no reliable evidence pinning the defendant to the crime.
The police testimony about what the defendant had admitted was garbage; that much was obvious.
The foreman had even pulled an outrageous stunt, claiming that the jury had reached a verdict even when they hadn't. The Holdout had exclaimed no at the point where the foreman claimed to find him guilty of capital murder.
A few weeks later, the Holdout saw in the news, the body of the defendant found in an alley. He was outraged at the media commentary supporting the murder.
He was motivated to search out the defense attorney, and see if there was anything he could do to help.
One evening after dark, he was out, and had to stop to fill his car. While the pump was running, he felt dizzy and faint, and felt himself falling to the ground.
The Defense Attorney's Story
Lawrence Abramowitz, Esq., realized that this was the best likely outcome of the case against his client. Ideally, his client would have received a non-guilty verdict, but he felt himself lucky that one juror saw the obvious -- and the prosecutor dropped the charges instead of having a retrial with a defense better prepared.
DNA testing had turned out against the defense, because some of the DNA matched the defendant. There were other alleles that didn't match either her or the defendant, but the prosecutor attributed that to her having sex with others. In his own argument, Larry had attributed the boyfriend's DNA match to voluntary sex, and the other alleles to the rapist or rapists.
Larry had several other criminal cases that he had to work on, and also he was going to sue various media outlets who libeled him in this highly public case.
Then his client, Chester Caveman, was found dead in an alley. It turned out his body was perfectly healthy, and had no sign of injury, poison, or anything else that might cause death. It was as if his brain had been turned off.
He called the police, who reassured him that the death was being investigated. Then the officer said, "It's shysters like you who render all our work for naught," and slammed down the phone.
A few days later, the body of the prosecution witness who had been surprisingly helpful was found in another alley. This received much less coverage in the media, just a brief mention. It took Larry several inquiries to establish that the mode of death was identical: it appeared that someone had simply turned off his brain.
A few days later still, the body of the holdout juror was discovered in yet another alley. And yes, the mode of death was again identical. This murder received less coverage than the defendant's, but more coverage than the witness's. And opinion was now divided about equally between support and opposition to his murder.
Larry was wondering if he had something to fear himself. He called the police and pointed out the identical features in the deaths, and that they were clearly related to his case. Someone was murdering for revenge. He expressed concern about his own safety.
At one point, he was out walking in broad daylight. Several persons were about, pretty much doing their own thing. At one point, he was well away from all other pedestrians, when he sensed an unwelcome odor in the air. He covered his mouth and face, and did his best to breath as little as possible, and ran toward a more populated area just next to an intersection with traffic signals.
He started breathing again, and felt dizziness try to overcome him. He fought.
"Are you okay?" asked a pedestrian.
"No, I think I'm being murdered," said Larry as the dizziness took hold of him, causing him to collapse. "Please record everything you can about any vehicle that takes me away." He finally fainted.
The next thing Larry knew, he found himself in a small, cluttered dorm room, and his client was slapping him in the face: once on his right cheek and again on his left. As his body screamed, and as he detected his body's thoughts, he realized that he was now inside the rape-murder victim's body. He could hear and feel and see what she did, and could hear some of her thoughts, but couldn't control anything.
Larry realized that this was where Debby was storming out of her boyfriend's, his client's, room and heading straight to her doom. Well, at least he'd find out who really murdered Debby. Not that it would do anyone any good at this point.
She stormed past the friendly prosecution witness, who exclaimed, "Debby!"
`Debby,' Larry thought as hard as he could. `Debby, you really don't want to continue the way you're going. You don't want to be raped or murdered.' It was futile, Larry knew. But he had to try. `Debby. This way lies Death.'
Debby slowed almost to a stop for a moment. Did Debby actually hear his thoughts? `Yes Debby, turn around. Your boyfriend's an asshole, but that boy you just passed might agree to put you up for the night.' Unfortunately, Debby started up again, and continued to the stairs. `No Debby, you don't wanna go that way.' Unfortunately, nothing further worked.
Then came the encounter with Charles and Troy. He experienced the full DP-rape as Debby did, and it hurt horribly. He couldn't scream even though he did mentally. Then he was helplessly carried to the bin and dumped inside.
While Debby passed out, Larry didn't pass out, even though he felt he was about to. The odor of garbage was atrocious, and the garbage plus the shorts in his mouth meant he was gradually suffocating. He was still helpless in Debby's body.
`Debby!' Larry mentally shouted. `Debby! Wake up, Debby! Debby! You're not dead yet; there's still hope!'
Debby began stirring.
'Yes, Debby. You're still alive. Come up, Debby, come up out of your sleep. We can escape this. Awaken, Debby.'
Debby suddenly struggled against the bonds holding her. The stench was awful.
`Not that way, Debby. Patience, Debby. Patience, patience.' Debby slowed down. `Yes, Debby, patience. This stench is just a nuisance, Debby. Nothing more; just a nuisance.'
Debby now seemed more receptive to Larry's thoughts, and Larry's first order of business was to calm Debby down and stop Debby's panic. Once that succeeded, Debby herself managed to slowly but surely work her arms free of their bindings.
It was now a simple matter to untie her legs. It was a little harder to climb up a pile of trash to the top and push the lid open enough to climb through and out. She fell hard, scraping herself on the concrete and twisting one foot.
`Congratulations, Debby! You're free!' thought Larry in her mind. `No hurry now, take your time, nurse your wounds.' After waiting a minute, during which Debby noticed she was naked but still gagged with her shorts, she put her shorts on properly. She breathed deeply the less rancid air outside the trash bin.
She was still topless. `Don't mind that, Debby. Now emergency medical.' Unfortunately, her ankle was still twisted and spranged. `The main dorm entrance, Debby. They'll help you. Not very far, Debby. You can make it.'
It took Debby some time to make her way around to the main dorm entrance, with the promise of aid.
"Has the jury reached their verdicts?" asked the judge.
"We have, your honor," answered the foreman.
"Would you please state the jury's verdicts," said the judge.
"We find both defendants guilty of aggravated sexual assault, guilty of aggravated kidnapping, guilty of aggravated assault, guilty of attempted capital murder, your honor," answered the foreman.
The judge interrogated every juror, asking if he or she concurred with the verdict. Every juror answered, "Yes."
Larry in Debby's mind found it eerie watching himself cross-examine the prosecution witnesses, introducing evidence of falsified forensics to discredit prosecution forensic evidence, arguing that the identification of the defendants as the attackers was strongly leading, as the defendants were at the defense table, among numerous other attempts to raise reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors.
When Debby or anyone in her family expressed outrage at the proceedings, Larry in Debby's mind held his peace. After all, he couldn't tell her that she might have been murdered, her former boyfriend prosecuted and possibly convicted and executed, and the two thugs who killed her still at loose among the population.
Larry sometimes had to remind himself that if he wasn't allowed to aggressively defend defendants like the two rapists, he wouldn't be allowed to aggressively defend innocents like the former boyfriend, or defendants charged with overextended offenses for innocent conduct or speaking out.
He also told himself that due to his aggressive defense, the defendants' convictions wouldn't be overturned because of ineffective assistance of counsel.
And Debby was no longer murdered, although she'd still experienced the other crimes. Debby's former boyfriend and innocent defendant, the witness, the holdout juror -- none of those would be murdered and mind-transferred to personally experience Debby's rape and murder. As for himself, well...
Debby found herself privy to a few discussions between her father and two university professors, one in the department of physics and one in the departments of both psychiatry and neurology in the school of medicine.
"I've studied and analyzed the professional conduct of lawyers in general," said the latter, "and defense attorneys in particular. They tend to be sociopaths, lacking conscience and empathy for the victims of crimes. Not only do they obstruct to the best of their abilities the punishment of criminals, they make it impossible to punish the worst criminals appropriately. The best one can do is confine them and extract a small amount of labor. One can no longer execute a rapist, an armed robber, or a carnal moral corrupter of a child, youth, or young lady."
Debby didn't like what she heard. It sounded as if she would be considered carnally morally corrupted for having sex and enjoying it.
Another time, the physics professor said, "We can take that attorney's soul, his consciousness, out of his brain and send it back in time into Debby's brain in time to have him personally experience the savage crime. He would ride Debby's mind piggy-back, experience everything that she experiences, but be unable to control her body in any way.
"The attorney's body would be completely healthy and whole for some time. Only the soul part of his brain, his consciousness and sensation, would be turned off."
Debby's dad asked, "Would you return the attorney to his own body after he experiences Debby's vicious rape?"
"No, we wouldn't. When we've tried reversing the process with animals, we wound up with parts of both souls in both brains. We put a cat's soul into a canary. Then we tried to return the cat's soul back to the cat, but one-tenth of the cat's soul remained in the canary, and half the canary's soul returned to the cat. Neither lived for more than a few minutes. With two different cats, similar soul-splitting occurred. Most cats lived up to one day. One cat managed to survive, but has a major defective split personality.
"We haven't yet tried to reverse the process and bring the soul back into its original body with humans. We could try it with two attorneys or criminals, but we dare not with Debby."
Debby was nauseated. Her stomach heaved, but she managed to prevent herself from vomiting. "NO! Enough evil's been done! Just leave the man alone." She ran out of the room, up to her own room.
Larry, who'd remained silent through all this, came alive. `They must do it, Debby.'
"WHAT?" exclaimed Debby. That was the first time she'd ever responded to Larry's thinking at her.
`They must send me back into your mind. Otherwise, you die in the trash bin, Debby.' Larry kept to himself the thoughts and fears of creating a real paradox -- destroying the space-time continuum, perhaps. He also kept his memory of the boyfriend and the other murders to himself.
"You're the attorney?"
`Lawrence Abramowitz, Esq., at your service, Miss Debby.'
"That means you've seen--" she instinctively covered her breasts and crotch, even though she was fully dressed in jeans and a long-sleeved corduroy shirt.
`You're very pretty, Miss Debby.'
"Thank you -- I think. And that was you haunting me that night! You... you... you tried turning me away, and then you got me out of that garbage!"
`You did the work, Debby. I motivated you. I saved my own skin as well. Make of that what you wish.'
"You've been inside me all the time?"
'Yes, since just before the crime.'
"It's him!" whispered Debby, involuntarily, as the unconscious attorney was brought in on a stretcher. They were in a room with a conveyor belt that passed through the hole of a huge donut-shaped machine.
"Excuse me?" One of the professors turned toward her, as the other professor flipped a switch on the donut machine.
"Nothing, nothing, sorry," she said, not only embarrassed, but terrified of saying something that would change their minds, or make them suspect that he was already in her mind. She she was unable to take her eyes off the proceedings, even though she was terrified to the point of nausea.
The donut machine flashed LEDs of various colors on and off, before settling to a pattern of green lights.
Larry also watched the proceedings with interest. He never insisted on being there; Debby did along with the rest of her family. But he was interested in what they were doing to him and how they were doing it.
Debby's family was practically gloating at seeing the attorney get his just desserts, as far as Debby could tell.
One of the professors, the physics one Debby thought, sat at a display on the side of the donut machine, and repeatedly typed and paused. "I've spotted both Debby, her boyfriend, and both rapists about four days before the crime. Their signatures has been identified, so we can aim for about five minutes before her rape.
"I'm preparing the presignals, each with their own signature. I'm setting the system to search and display the presignals in addition to the humans. Several have to be sent -- and the system is now displaying the presignal locations as well. I'm going to send them as preprogrammed -- don't ask me what happens if I don't send the presignals out now. Just don't. They've already arrived, at Debby's location about three minutes before the start of the crime. Two signals are in fact close enough to Debby and far enough from the boyfriend that the soul sent to either of their locations will dive into Debby.
"We're going to send our chosen presignal last, when we send the attorney's soul. Although we can't test the presence of the soul, it has arrived the same time and place as the chosen presignal."
They put his body on a conveyor belt, with his head aimed toward the donut machine. One of the professors turned on the conveyor belt, and the attorney's head slowly passed through the donut hole. The belt reversed, and the attorney slowly slid back. The belt reversed again, sending the attorney's head through the donut hole, and reversed again, returning the attorney's head back out.
Meanwhile, a series of LEDs on the machine arranged in a circle flashed on and off more or less at random. When the conveyor belt stopped, another LED shifted from green to red, as the circular LEDs continued their flashing.
Finally, the circular LEDs stopped flashing, and the red LED returned to green. The psychiatry professor said, "It's been done."
"Did it succeed?" asked Dad.
"About 90% chance of success, yes," answered the professor.
"Any way to test it?"
"We can't look back in time and detect actual souls, if that's what you're asking. As for testing now, it's been months. He's probably died out of her mind."
The physics professor said, "There's always a danger in sending a soul back in time. There's also a danger in testing the results before we do it."
"What kind of danger?"
"The problem's really the same as if we detected a presignal that we sent, and then didn't send it. What if we tested Debby's brain and detected the presence of the attorney, and then didn't send the attorney back. What happens?"
The psychiatry professor said, "That would be an interesting experiment. But the physicist here won't allow it. But someday, I'll do it."
"Not if I have any say in the matter!" retorted the physicist.
`They're playing with the universe. A dangerous game,' said Larry in Debby's mind. `At least the physicist realizes it. They have to be caught and stopped, even if not for my murder.'
On the way home, Debby said, "It succeeded."
"What? Oh, the attorney?" asked Dad.
"Yeah, he's been in my mind since just before the crime."
"So he experienced your crime, and now knows what it's really like?" asked her older sister. "Good!"
"Better, Sis. I vaguely felt his haunting, first trying to divert me from the crime. Then in the trash bin, I sensed his haunting and ideas. He encouraged me awake and helped me escape. I would have died otherwise, I think. Once I was with others who would help me, he went silent. Until I first heard you talking about sending him back to experience my crime; he came alive then."
"Trying to get you to persuade us not to send him back?"
"No, just the opposite. He said it had to be done; I would have died otherwise. But now he says they're playing a dangerous game with the universe, and have to be stopped. I hope you remember the exchange between the physicist and the psychiatrist, about not sending something after it's known to have been sent."
The following day, the news announced the discovery of the attorney's brain-dead body in an alley. A week later, the two professors and several aides were arrested for the murder of the attorney. They were also suspected in other brain-dead bodies found around the city during the previous two years, murders unsolved until now.
Larry, who had been fighting ever-increasing tiredness and an ever stronger drive to drift asleep, finally decided his work and his time were over. He let sleep overtake him, determined now to Rest In Peace.
Comments
Very Confusing
but not in a necessarily bad way. It was confusing but that is often the case with such things. All-in-all i'm glad justice was done, even if it meant an injustice was performed in the process. I guess this raises the question: does the end justify the means?
Thanks for writing this, it was very interesting.
A very interesting concept
The story overall was interesting in how the victim was saved. It was a bit of a refreshing event concerning how the girl was saved.
There are a few unanswered questions tho concerning how the victim survives while the other victims do not. So for all plausibility it must be stated that the now surviving victim is wrapped (for lack of a better term) walking paradox in that she should not have lived. The accused should never have been needed except to possibly be used as a witness for the girl and the juror would have never have been outed as he did not rise when the verdict was rendered.
But lets say, hypothetically, the universe allowed the old events to play out it would then take its own corrective actions to hold the universe together. Why would the professors be allowed to continue with the vendetta the father harbored against his daughter as the attorney would have altered it to where the true perpetrators were punished. No longer would Chester be viewed as the accused and thus he would not go to trial and therefor not be subjected to being sent into the past.
Would it still allowed the victim to live? Or to die in some other unfortunate accident? Are we saying that whatever the future had occurred been wiped away or modified to where she was allowed to live? Or are we saying that there was no future in the beginning or was never fully solidified into history itself and was therefor erased when a new reality took hold? Its mind boggling to say the least.
But overall I liked the story, except I would have had it where Debbie found the voice fading, slipping away. Larry slowly drifted away from inside her, having found his work to be done. Within her Debbie heard him, felt him, say in a tired voice he was going to rest, sleep for a moment, herself saddened in knowing Larry would not return, no longer to speak to her, be a part of her, knowing it was him who had saved her life at the cost of his.
Time-Travel is Paradoxical
captwbstr and licorice: Thanks, I'm flattered! I wouldn't know if the end justifies the means in this case. I think it's more that Larry exploited a wholly evil act to produce justice in the end.
IB: Time-travel and reality shifts lead to serious paradoxes -- I'm currently stuck in a corner in my Bikini Beach sequel because of this, and right now I feel that I'm being pushed in a direction I don't want to go. Time travel is logically contradictory (another phrase for paradoxical), violates causality, and violates energy and momentum conservation.
In this new reality -- I think I mentioned it in the story -- only Larry (the defense attorney) gets sent back. The boyfriend (Chester), the witness, and the holdout juror of the original trial never get sent back, and are still alive and well. I brushed over it in both trials, but Larry had to have been a major-league scum-bucket in the trial if he did his job properly -- maybe even personally to Debby on the witness stand. (And I really hope that the police didn't repeat their interrogation on the new suspects.)
Debby and her family really hated Larry. Larry had to remind himself in Debby's body, that his reasons were still valid. He held his peace in the face of Debby's fury.
I glossed over Larry's scumbaggery, and omitted Debby's hatred and fury, unfortunately, not thinking it through properly. Debby would have been severely conflicted at discovering Larry in her own mind, and learning that Larry helped save her life. I decided to leave it to the reader to cry at Larry's final submission to death -- and leave it an open question whether he really dies, or continues to ride Debby's mind the rest of her life.
-- Daphne Xu (a page of contents)
fascinating
and horrifying at the same time. The attorney got an innocent boy off, an arsehole perhaps but not a rapist nor murderer. He also stopped the two professors from continuing into what would surely be a horrifying future. Mad science at it's worst. A beautifully crafted tale. I still have the shivers.
I am a Proud mostly Native American woman. I am bi-polar. I am married, and mother to three boys. I hope we can be friends.
Weird
This is a strange and interesting story. But also a story which poses a few questions.
As the title suggests, this story is not about TRUTH or JUSTICE. It's about getting even for a perceived wrong. Even though there is no concrete evidence against the accused.
If you want to watch a movie version of this storys' main theme, watch the Oxbow Incident. It's set in Nevada, USA, in 1885. It's reported a well liked cattle rancher has been killed and his cattle stolen. A group of townsmen decide to handle things when they find three men with the ranchers' cattle.
The problem with vengeance is that those committing the act weren't present when the crime occurs. So instead of staying rational beings by relying on current evidence, they become nothing more than snarling animals acting solely on emotions.
If we throw rational out the window and decide for ourselves whose guilty and innocent, based on hearsay or our emotions, then we are also throwing out civilization as well.
The other driving factor in this story are the physicist and psychiatrist, who did what they did because they could. While the physicist realized what was being done was wrong, the psychiatrist wanted to continue because it was research. To me, his moral compass was broken and in need of serious repairs.
No, we can not allow the ends to justify the means. For if we do then anything, up to and including, wiping out all life can occur.
Others have feelings too.