Male Reduction Syndrome revealed...
The first three parts of this story can be found here:
Jack be nimble?
Jack won't quit?
Jack gets whacked by the candlestick
The last we hear from Jack
Written and edited by Myself
"Mr. President, I believe it may be time to address the country about this condition. The information is going to get out, but I think we need to control its release..."
"Listen Mike, give it to me straight. Pretend I didn't go to Yale... that... that I'm just some jackass the V.P. pulled in off the street."
"Well Mr. President, one of our guys in Atlanta got a call from a friend at Pasteur. He claims he's found a possible link between sexual activity and the emergence of MRS."
"And this French fella," the President interrupted, "he asked our guy to have our people look into it?"
"That's correct Mr. President. The CDC was in the process of issuing a bulletin to U.S. hospitals when I heard about it. I've had them hold the release because there's no telling how this information will play with the public; and you know if the CDC issues a bulletin it'll hit the news inside the hour."
"I can appreciate we're in a real bind here Mike. You tell the CDC to hold off for now. Lemme bounce this off a few more heads and see if this boat don't still float."
"Mr. President?"
"Thanks for bringin' this to my attention Mike. Lemme get back to you."
---
Jack and Stacy were on the road for an hour before they spoke.
"Where are you going?" Stacy asked.
"I... nowhere... somewhere else... "
Jack knew they didn't have enough gas to drive around very long. In their rush to leave the house they left behind everything... clothing, belongings, money, ID.... It occurred to Jack that they would need some of these things if they were going to get very far.
"Jack, you aren't going back are you?"
"We're going to need some stuff," Jack replied. "We're going to need money for gas, if nothing else. We've got less than half a tank."
Stacy sat back in her seat. What could she say? Jack was right. As the anonymous blur of houses whisked by her window, she wondered how many of the inhabitants would sympathize with her plight; or how many were similarly in flight? How would they get their stuff? Would it still be there? Could they replace it if it wasn't? Would they still have a job? Would there be lots of people out of a job? Where would they get money?
"Jack, we're in a lot of trouble."
"You don't say," Jack replied, with just a hint of sarcasm.
Ignoring his tone, Stacy continued, "There could be lots of people out there running. If they're not working they're not earning money. If they're not working something's not getting done. If they're not earning money they won't have as much to spend. If they're not spending, someone else is not earning as much. It's a downward spiral Jack, and it could be a rough landing... if anyone lets us land at all."
Jack drove past their house looking for signs of activity. Seeing none, Jack left the small suburban subdivision and pulled over on the highway, just outside. The plan was simple. Stacy would approach the house from the rear. Their house was along the outer edge of the neighborhood (a six foot wall separated the neighborhood from the highway), so Stacy would not have to pass within view of the neighbors' houses to gain access to their fenced in back yard. Both of them just assumed Stacy COULD climb the wall leading to their back yard, even though they had never before had the occasion to try. Jack and Stacy were in decent shape, for a married couple with kids. Once in the back yard, Stacy would not bother with finding an unlocked door. She would use the tire iron from the trunk, wrapped in an old beach towel, to punch out one of the small frosted window panes of the door leading from the back porch to the downstairs bathroom. (The house was built with a backyard pool in mind.) As it turned out, she didn't need the tire iron. Someone had already broken the sliding glass door leading from the family room to the back porch.
Stepping into the house, Stacy was surprised to see the interior relatively undisturbed. She assumed the house had been ransacked. However, while there were a few things tossed about, everything was largely untouched. She moved quietly upstairs, wary of anyone that might still be inside, and checked for her wallet in the master bedroom. It was there where she left it, along with Jack's in the dresser. She collected both and tossed them in a suitcase retrieved from the closet. She grabbed a few changes of clothes, taking shorts and shirts that would fit both her and Jack. She picked out some clothes for the kids, and then moved on to the bathroom. She collected a few toiletries. She got a thermos from the kitchen (filling it with water), as well as some snack food. With everything stuffed into the suitcase, she headed back to the porch, the yard, and towards her waiting family.
"Is that you Stacy?" It was their neighbor Jean, a middle-aged mother of three. "Don't worry. No one is here but me," she said in a sympathetic voice. Jean had always been a good neighbor; someone Stacy's family could count on for the odd, last minute favor. Their kids played together, despite slight differences in age, and had spent many nights at each other's house while their parents got away for the occasional evening retreat. Jean wasn't nearly the introvert Jack and Stacy had been, and served as their conduit to the rest of the neighborhood. Many people wouldn't know Jack and Stacy's names were it not for Jean.
Stacy stopped at the wall, holding the suitcase at shoulder level - clearly struggling to hold it there, but neither ready to throw it over, nor quite off guard enough to put it down.
"You know me well enough to know I wouldn't do anything to hurt you or your family, don't you Stacy?"
"So much happened so fast..." Stacy began.
"Mike was running out the door just as you and Jack were heading down the street," Jean said, referring to her husband. "Those folks in your house were out of control; but they were more afraid than angry. Mike told them the police were on their way and they scattered pretty quickly. They weren't... really, but those guys weren't around long enough to find out. Why don't you all come to our house?"
"But they'll come back," Stacy interrupted.
"Please Stacy, where else can you go? There's safety in numbers. We'll hunker down and figure out what to do next together. Besides, I don't think those guys were so out of it that they'd come back. I think Mike might've scared a little sense back into them. At worst, we can call Smith and Wesson for a little back up."
At that Stacy grinned. She didn't turn from the wall right away, but the suitcase made it's way to the ground and Stacy's shoulders slumped in a sigh of relief.
---
No one was surprised when the violence started, but many were surprised that it wasn't worse. Few people died as a direct result of the violence, although scores of MRS men were injured.
The large number of MRS cases reported in the news prompted a lot of men to take a closer look at themselves. Many of them discovered that they had lost weight too, although they had not noticed a change in their outward appearance... yet. It was in this way that the number of reported MRS cases exploded. News reports brought more attention, which brought more reported cases, which brought more attention.
Interestingly, most of these men were not terribly concerned about their weight loss, or the prospect that they may have MRS. This was a good thing, because in short order the number of adult men known to be affected by MRS (mostly by their own inspection) surpassed the number of men not affected. In a matter of weeks a sense of inevitability, or learned helplessness replaced anger (manifested by fear) among unchanged men. MRS was everywhere. There was no getting away from it. Everyone knew someone that had it, or strongly suspected they had it themself. MRS was too real - too personal, for too many, for the violence to continue.
The explosion of reported MRS cases produced a treasure trove of information, and health organizations began to ignore their governments in the search for a cause. It all began with a single researcher in France with a hunch. It spread overseas to his closest friends and colleagues. Together they learned it wasn't just those two French hospitals... it was the whole world: all MRS men had been fertile, sexually active, and were fathers. This information leaked to the public when scientists began surveying unchanged men. A new wave of anxiety, many orders of magnitude lower than the first swept the world... but quickly subsided. It turned out sexual urges are a powerful force, combined with the human ability to rationalize... and a shoe that had yet to drop.
With this new information, gathered from unchanged men, the world came very close to learning the cause. Although the specific mechanism was still unknown, it became apparent that conception created some kind of trigger carried by the mother and child. Subsequent casual contact with the father, by either the child or the mother, would cause MRS. Contact with the mother could trigger MRS in as little as 72 hours after conception. Complicating matters for men, something else seemed to be at work, beyond the trigger mechanism for MRS. It seemed that men displayed signs similar to addiction after sexual intercourse with women; even if conception did not take place. This phenomenon was specific to the woman. In other words, a man did not become attached to women in general; just to the woman they had sex with. It was subtle, so it wasn't noticed until after the news of MRS spread... and men began to leave their sexual partners in large numbers, hoping to avoid MRS. As it turned out, leaving didn't work. They felt emotionally compelled to return... and did... in large numbers. It's unknown when these signs of addiction first manifest themselves, but it is believed it may have begun a year to 18 months before the first case of MRS was reported. No one even noticed the sharp decline in divorce rates (other than a few attorneys) until someone thought to look.
A complete transformation into an adult, biological female finished approximately one year after the first signs of MRS appeared in affected men. Ovulation and menstruation occurred approximately 18 months after the first signs of MRS appeared.
Financial markets remained closed for six weeks. Local shortages of food and supplies began to disappear sooner, shortly after the outbreaks of violence stopped. A worldwide economic recession resulted from the disruption, but a total collapse of the world's financial markets was averted by the six-week closure. When the markets reopened prices fell, but not nearly as far as they could have.
---
Throughout history, human kind has grappled with the question of its origins. In modern times, the question boiled down to a debate between the scientific and religious communities - or "evolution" versus "creationism." Some members of the scientific community tried to assert that one could believe in God AND evolution. Some members of the religious community tried to mix in a touch of evolution with their beliefs, a kind of back-door creationism that came to be known as "intelligent design."
Naturally, I find this debate amusing. I like to think of myself as intelligent, but I'm no more so than my peers. Sure, I know a few things that others don't, but there's nothing mystical about it. I suppose one of their writers was right... technology beyond one's own capability is indistinguishable from magic.
One day, when the people of Earth are ready, they'll learn the truth... that the periods of rapid change throughout their world's development - which their theory of evolution has trouble explaining - does have cause. One day they'll learn their home is not the only home to intelligent life in the universe. When they're ready to set aside their arrogance, they'll find it just as interesting as we did to learn the stories taught in our religious traditions are startlingly similar.
With any luck, this latest tweak will get us all a lot closer to that day.
The End.
Comments
Wanted A Bit More
I thought it was fairly well written, coherent and suspenseful, right up until almost the end. The last few paragraphs not only don't wrap up the mystery, they fuzz it out in a theme of something approaching interstellar magic realism. While the point was intended to be profound, perhaps religious, and full of wonderment for the marvels of evolution, the effect was one of disappointment by at least this reader, robbed of a tidy wrapup, or even a clue of understanding.
My fetish for satisfying story endings is a bit unreasonable, I know, but you seemed to be promising us one the whole time, so forgive me if I'm wondering why we either never got there, or I missed it somehow.
re: Wanted A Bit More
I don't want to try to dispute your conclusions (other than it was fairly well written). I think you have a fairly good grasp of where I was trying to go, so I don't have much in the way of clarification that I can offer. I'll try to offer a little background and segue to a half-hearted defense of the piece.
This effort represents an attempt at new means of personal escapism. My professional life requires a LOT of writing. I've flirted with a personal journal most of my life. But all of this prior experience has involved a lot of first person, argumentative, or instructional writing. Much of my personal writing tended to take on a brooding, cynical, and dark mood. Well, I've been an anonymous reader of this site and others of its kind for some time, and I decided to try something that was completely different (from my previous experiences)... a work of fiction, writing from a point of view which was anything BUT first person, and with a little dialog (something I've never attempted before).
For reasons that may be outwardly apparent, as well for personal reasons, it was a failure. I never presumed writing fiction was easy, but I didn't think I would find it quite this hard either. It failed to serve as an outlet... as a means of "escape"... because it didn't come easy (at all), and I think that may have come across in the writing.
As for the ending... going for the profound may have been a bit too ambitious for a first attempt at fiction. However, some of my favorite stories, in all manner of media (books, television, movies), leave certain things unresolved. I don't remember where I heard it (or read it), but I recall someone speaking about their writing and commenting that the hardest thing for him was knowing when to stop writing. I'm not sure if this is exactly what he (or she) meant, but I think there can be a tendency to tell the reader too much; to try and tie everything up too neatly. I was hoping for an ending which explained just enough, which gave just enough cause for the effect; but which also made the story seem a little "larger" than it really was. As a fan of early X-Files episodes, what drew me in wasn't a detailed explanation for each phenomenon encountered... but rather, that there was an element of the unexplained... that "something is out there."
I'm not going to be so bold as to compare this modest little story to the X-Files, but I was shooting for that kind of balance, one which (I had hoped) continued to engage the reader after they were finished. Rather than explain every nuance of MRS; such as it's basis in science and it's subsequent, long term effect on society, I was hoping to stroke the reader's imagination.
I also avoided going into too much detail on the causes of MRS, in the hopes that it would make it more real. I'm not an expert, but I know just enough physical science that a bad explanation can ruin a story for me. For me, fiction is all about the suspension of disbelief. In that vein, I hoped to avoid a pseudo-scientific explanation which would make the story seem more far-fetched.
In either case, I don't dispute the fact that I didn't succeed... in part, for the reasons I gave above.
Finally, I'm sorry for going on and on. Clearly this comment is an example of not knowing when to stop writing ;)
All the same, I do want to sincerely thank you for your feedback. It's food for thought... I'm giving more thought to where that proper balance (that I described above) lies.
Suggestion
First of all, let me apologize for causing the handwringing. You wrote a very nice story, and you have nothing to be ashamed of, and no reason to be defensive.
I suspect your own disappointment might parallel my own, in that you would enjoy the story more with a better ending. There's something about a nice ending (and that doesn't mean the same as a "happy ending", btw) that amplifies a good story and makes it better.
Your assertion that too much scientific-like explanation, if it's unreasonable or off-the-mark, would ruin the story is right on the money. This story, though, does call for a scientific-like explanation, because of how you wrote it. At least, what I'm saying is that it SEEMS to. Now, there's no need to stay in the time-honored, well-worn ruts of sci-fi, but I think it's more difficult to find another path that would work as well for the ending.
Anyway, here's a modest suggestion that fits with your objections. I agree that a refutable explanation causes more trouble than it solves, so here's a sample irrefutable one. You're absolutely welcome to it if you want.
As you may know, some species currently respond to population pressures by changing sexes. In particular, some fish. If the dominant male is removed from a population, one of the females may become a male. I haven't been keeping up with the studies, but I think there are also males who become females under some circumstances, and some fish who cycle back and forth, able to produce both sperm and eggs at various times. Of course, it's way easier with fish, because they're not required to carry their young until birth. Everything happens externally, so the internal apparatus is minimal.
But, it's enough of a hook that you could hang an ending on it and it would at least have a shred of evidence of possibility.
Your touching on the subject of evolution, even as barely as you touched it, contained a flaw. The idea that the population could suddenly evolve en masse is not tenable. So, that explanation, which you hinted at, certainly doesn't work for me. And, unlike the Whateley and Morfs stories, you didn't want to use the overworked virus theme. So, here's my suggestion:
Built into the primate gene structure, and our own, was a long-dormant mechanism to prevent overcrowding and die-off of an entire species. In the course of trying to explain MRS, some scientist finds a mysterious pre-existing "trigger switch" in the human genome. Once triggered, presumably by population level, but they don't necessarily know how, it affects the entire population at once, causing the exact behavior you describe. (Men who breed can only do it once or twice, and then, that's it. It's a population-control trigger.) Boom! There it is, an ending that's food for thought! As far as explaining how the "trigger" works, probably less is more. I doubt the scientists will have figured it out for several more years, anyway.
As a population-control mechanism, the irony is, it doesn't necessarily work at all. Gay men, monks, and randy teens could supply enough sperm for the entire planet of fertile women, by the use of artificial insemination. But, hey, just because there's a work-around doesn't mean that nature didn't create the mechanism, or that you should tidy up the explanation to be airtight.
At that point, you can either say something about the wonders of evolution, or the marvels (or stupidity) of I.D., or the vastness of space, or the futility of trying to stop humans from breeding, or whatever rocks your boat.
If I were you, I'd take a week or two off, and then go back and readdress the ending and see if I could find something I was happier with. If you can, I think you'll enjoy your entire story much more. (Of course, I'm likely just projecting my own fetish for "proper" endings, so forgive my presumption.) Just changing four paragraphs might make a world of difference.
In any event, please keep writing. I'm sorry you weren't completely happy with your first effort, but it was really pretty good. And, I'm very sorry if my comment was in any way discouraging. That wasn't my intent.
re: suggestion
Please don't feel responsible for my sense of ennui. Mostly, it comes to me naturally - of its own accord. And please let me know if this comes across as defensive. I prefer to think of this as a discussion, and I hope it comes across that way. Although I've been a silent, anonymous reader for a little while, I hold contributors here in high regard; particularly now, after I found it such a struggle to write a short piece of fiction.
I mentioned that I didn't want to give a pseudo-scientific explanation for MRS... when, as you point out, I tossed in a reference to evolution. The reference to evolution, creationism, and religion might have been a mistake; but here's what I was thinking when I wrote it. Rather than explain MRS as a product of evolution, I was trying to show that MRS came about via outside "tinkering." I hadn't thought of MRS as a means to control population growth, or as an evolutionary kind of adaptation to environmental pressures. Instead, I was thinking more along the lines of social development, as a species. An intelligent race sees where we (human kind) are going (in terms of our social relationships with other individuals, societies, cultures, etc), and decides to give us a nudge - albeit a whopper of a nudge. I gave thought to expanding on this notion, looking at how MRS would impact the world's cultures, touching on current events; but I'm a politics junkie, and I found it hard to go too far along that line of thought without injecting my politics into it... and having the story deleted from the system ;)
Also, on the evolution note... you mentioned a flaw:
I must admit, you may be right. I should have done a little research on the issue if I was going to put it in the story, particularly if I was shooting for a pinch of realism. This is where a little bit of knowledge can be dangerous... I have this hazy recollection from lessons dealing with evolution (many, many moons ago, while still a school aged lad) of something referred to as "Punctuated Equilibrium," as well as a something referred to as "macromutation." My admittedly hazy recollection was that these concepts applied to speciation... or the rate at which species evolved from other species. The thought (as I recalled) was that for some species, evolution did not take place at a constant, slow pace. Instead, some species remained unchanged for relatively long periods of time, then went through a sudden period of change - some of which without evidence of transitional forms. It was my recollection that there are some good explanations for this (sudden climate change, etc), but that in some cases the process of speciation was not well understood. That's not to say that it is necessarily a hole in the theory of evolution... as there are some good explanations... just that it's not completely understood (we still got some learnin' to do).
I was playing a little fast and loose with this recollection, thinking that it might be interesting if a few of these sudden changes in the rate of speciation had a sci-fi'ish explanation. This brings us to the switch in narrative at the end, a little first person-ish, journal-like note from someone or something which may have been responsible for a few of those sudden changes (or more rapid speciation events) in the past... as well as MRS. (On a personal note: I must say that while my story smacks of "intelligent design," I'm not personally a subscriber.)
Having said all of that, please don't think your replies were a source of consternation. It did give me an outlet to vent my own, pre-existing frustration... but nothing more than that.
People who know me know that I tend to go on... and on... and on... and on... when I write. That's partly why I found this exercise in fiction so frustrating. I can write a journal entry or an essay on current events/politics, and churn out 10,000 words without breaking a sweat. Telling a story (this story) became a chore, and telling a good story should never be a chore.
Finally, I appreciate your suggestions. They were good, well thought out, and I will keep them in mind. I may do just as you suggested... set this aside for a while and take a peek at it later, with a fresher set of eyes.
Please know that I write this with a smile on my face and gratitude in my heart.
Darwin's Radio
With regard to evolution and "Punctuated Equilibrium" check out the science fiction novel "Darwin's Radio" by Greg Bear.
Rapid Evolutionary Change
Just to continue the discussion, and just for the fun of it. It's just a discussion of what little I know about genetics and evolution. My college degree is in Theatre Arts, so take that into account. (anything I know about genetics comes from an honors biology class in high school, and a couple college classes in anthropology, and one of those mostly on paleontology. and all of that a while back, i'm afraid.)
You're absolutely correct, in that there have been periods of rapid change in some species. But, check the time-scale of those changes. I think you'll find that a "rapid" change is measured in hundreds of generations, not minutes.
Once born, an individual is kind of stuck with whatever their genetic makeup is at birth. Different traits may express themselves. Different talents or capabilities, pre-existing, can be emphasized and employed, but the genetic makeup of the individual is not going to change. Some cells will mutate, of course, from natural radiation, environmental chemicals (including from plants), or just the wear and tear of needing to live in an oxidative atmosphere. A mutated cell may die, may be determined to be a foreign invader and be snuffed by a killer white cell, may go berserk and become a cancer, or just continue whatever its function was, perhaps better, perhaps worse. With the exception of a deadly cancer, none of this changes much in the affected individual.
However, if the change is in a germ cell that eventually creates a sperm or egg that ends up in a zygote that develops to term, his or her offspring may have a new genetic trait, which may or may not be useful.
Most germ-cell mutations result in still-births, btw. Of those who survive until reproductive maturity, evolution will decide if the individual has enough of an advantage for that trait to spread in the population and luck will determine whether it's a dominant or recessive gene. Lots of bad crap can spread in recessive genes, too, because it's not immediately a disadvantage for the individual carrying it, only for the one-in-four offspring of two individuals who both carry it. It's a slow process, essentially. In the case where it's a REALLY important advantage, and with the luck of being carried in a dominant gene, it can become endemic in the population within a few dozen generations, perhaps.
But, one thing is for certain. Given a large population of individuals born without a given genetic trait, nothing resembling evolution is going to cause them to develop a new trait in their lifetime, not individually, and certainly not collectively.
About the fishes
There are numerous species of fishes where individuals can switch between male and female roles depending on the environment, unlike humans though the fish reproductive system is almost identical in both sexes (as you pointed out) but, more importantly, there is no genetic difference between males and females. In fact only mammals, birds and some species of insects differentiate males and females at a genetic level (according to wikipedia and some hazy memories at least). Also while in mammals the male gene is a mutation of the female one it is the opposite for birds (which implies that genetic differentiation between sexes occurred after mammals and birds split).
I'm not sure if this is going to be of interest to anyone, but I always found it very interesting especially since it's rarely explicitly mentioned anywhere.
I agree with Pippa. ...
... While I enjoyed the story, I was frustrated by the hurried and abrupt ending. If MRS continues to spread, and only men who only get sexual relief by masturbation are left as male, won't those men either become kings or sperm producing slaves to insure survival of the species? What happens to the species when the gene pool is so drastically reduced? The whole realm of social change that might be brought about by widespread MRS is blown away by this abrupt extraterriestrial ending.
"All the world really is a stage, darlings, so strut your stuff, have fun, and give the public a good show!" Miss Jezzi Belle at the end of each show
BE a lady!
Only men left
I think you're wrong that only masturbators and abstainers are immune. It seemed like it was just having sex with women that was triggering MRS, so I'd expect gay men would get to stay male. Which makes the whole thing a brilliant reversal of the way society views sexuality.
Nice work, Myself!
I'm a little shaky ...
... about the upside to the MRS plague. How is this supposed to help humanity grow as a species? Billions of transformed men betrayed by their bodies, becoming virtual slaves addicted to the last woman they had sex with? And those women having complete control over their men are of course going to be paragons of virtual and consideration, and not take advantage of the fact that their mates can never, EVER leave them -- no matter how abusive or controlling they may become?
MRS as a form of population control? Now there's an understatement. Yes, I know there are billions of people here already, but when the birth rate plummets to near zero and the population begins its decline, things are going to start to get a bit tense. Just to protect their territorial imperatives, governments with smaller populations will throw individual human rights out the window in an effort to impregnate as many women as possible. Those men unaffected by the plague will become prisoners of a world trying desperately to fight the spectre of extinction -- unless science perfects a way to induce pregnancy without sperm.
In the end, the last few men will eventually die out, leaving a world of lesbians -- half of them slaves to the other, and both dependent on science for the continuation of the human race. Oh, the next generation might sort out the whole relationship issue once the enslaved former men die out, but that's a long time for billions of people to be trapped in relationships they never wanted as addicted chattel. And if male children are still being born into a world with MRS, they'll have nothing to look forward to but that same biological imperative -- the same slavery their predecessors were trapped in. Biology as destiny, forever and ever, amen? *sigh*
And according to the alien intelligence, this is a good thing? I guess I'm not alien or intelligent enough to grasp how this is going to make things better -- unless it's part of the "set your house on fire to forget about your broken arm" school of using one disaster to divert humanity from war and hatred.
Somebody better check that alien's IQ test. *grin*
Randalynn
It's not that bad...
...or is it? (hint depends on what sex you are)
As far as we know from the story males are not going to die out.Nothing in the description of MRS suggests that male children are no longer born. On the other hand I do agree that eventually governments would make it a "man's duty" to father 2 children and go out in a blaze of femininity to maintain population levels and with the (not for much longer) males addicted to their partners I can envision some women decide that being pregnant for 5-10 years is worth gaining a handful of slaves.
Not Quite As Stark As That
Don't forget, there will still be male children born, and they'll grow up normally, with all the functioning bits. They'll each get at least one bite at the apple for making more offspring. Further, it's not yet determined yet just what the parameters are for the transformation. Perhaps it is only the birth of male children.
The plot isn't particularly clear just yet. If "Myself" wants to continue with the theme, or even just to tune this one story, there's lots of wiggle room.
I agree, though, with your assessment that if this is an outside force imposing this, then it's a totally stupid one, as the results won't necessarily resemble whatever it is they thought it might. Humans are quite resourceful and adaptive.
Here's a slightly levitatious example. Picture a time in the distant future. A baby-making party. A social event for 16 year olds in which one "self-sacrificing" male goes off with 10 females at a time around the new moon (if it's true that many women's cycles are in sync with the full moon, then around the new moon many women would be ovulating), to impregnate as many as possible in a wild week-long orgy. And how would the enslavement mechanism work in such a circumstance? It would probably break. Once you have more than one boss, the conflict between them actually gives you some freedom.
Anyway, as a story mechanism, it has a wonderful amount of mischief possible. People, I believe, will always find a way to make themselves happy and build social structures that work for them. That is, when they're not hell-bent on making themselves miserable.
Jack
This is the second attempt at a comment. The first time I didn't want to seem as if I were piling on about the ending, and didn't have much new to say that Pippa hadn't already said. But what the heck. Through your replies, you have proved yourself a mature individual who is truly interested in straight feedback.
I like the way you write. You have an atractive, dry humor and the read was swift and effortless. It's a difficult thing to learn, and that you have it naturally is a big plus. Count yourself lucky.
Now, about the story: I have the impression that you weren't quite sure of how to handle the MRS issue. Randalynn has already covered the practical issues with MRS. I'm not sure why you added the particular details of essential bondage to women at the very end. It was as if you had intended to write a chapter or two exploring the sociological aspects of the new culture, of which that would certainly have been a factor, and then decided to end the story quickly. As it is, in my opinion, MRS is too convoluted to make a clear point on intelligent design or morality.
Your point about the X-Files ending is noted, and I sort of see what you were doing, but I think you maybe went too esoteric here. Whether an ending is satisfying or not is subjective. However, I don't think it quite worked in this case.
If this doesn't make sense to you, then you are perfectly free to disregard what I wrote. :)
Don't let this critique discourage you. I was with you until the last couple of pages. Depending on the story, sometimes satisfying endings are very HARD, and stories have been abandoned because authors, me included, couldn't find a proper way to terminate the dang thing.
Aardvark
"Happiness is when what you think, what you say, and what you do are in harmony."
Mahatma Gandhi
"Happiness is when what you think, what you say, and what you do are in harmony."
Mahatma Gandhi
Sorry if I came down ...
... a little hard, Myself. It was a good story, and I stayed with it all the way to the end. But the problems with MRS do tend to make the ending problematic, and we never do find out exactly what happened with Jack and family, except maybe in a generic way.
*hugs* Keep writing, though. Aardvark is right -- you have a nice touch, a natural flow to your writing.
Randalynn
What, me down?
Please be patient with me on this reply... fever, cold medication, and rational thought are not your typical bedfellows...
I just wanted to say that I didn't think anyone came down too hard - or even a little hard (for that matter). In fact, there was one thing you (Randalynn) said that was particularly gratifying. This is either going to sound silly, or down-right puzzling; but a smile crept across my face when you said:
Don't get me wrong, it's nice to get some affirmation. The reassurances about my writing make be feel a little better... but the above comment hit the nail right on the head. That pretty much sums up where I envisioned taking the story. I keep bringing up "intelligent design," not because I'm a subscriber, but because it was a story on NPR (about ID) a while back which planted a seed and eventually lead to the idea to write this story.
In a previous reply I spoke of having considered continuing the story, focusing on the effects on society/culture. I think I might have said something about current events and politics... well, one thing fever and cold medication is good for: it lowers one's inhibitions. There have been many critiques of "intelligent design," one of which goes something like... if the development of the universe/Earth/life was shaped and guided every step of the way by an "intelligence" of some kind, he/she/it must not have been all THAT intelligent - either that or it had a wild sense of humor. (Please note: I don't mean this as a slam on religion or God. I'm one of those people who thinks a belief in God and the theory of evolution are not mutually exclusive.) I envisioned our "intelligent benefactors" being well meaning, but anything but perfect... something like human kind, just more significantly more advanced. They see a developing world, see its potential good and its potential pitfalls, and decides to "help" every now and again.
I had a couple of angles to pursue as to why our benefactors thought MRS would help, involving the sexual dynamics between individuals, the more aggressive nature of males, and how shifting those balances could affect larger society. I'd go from there to the unintended consequences... and this is where I thought I might get into trouble... discussing tangents to current events (which I'm positively dying to make, but which would/will doubtless get me into trouble).
I have a few other comments which don't necessarily apply to your posts, but I'm going to address them here anyway...
The comments about the story coming to an abrupt ending probably have merit. One thing (among many) that I could have made clearer is that I didn't intend to characterize the post-sex, pre-conception effect on men as an overwhelming, enslaving addition. I intended for the effect to be more subtle. I didn't want to completely strip men of the ability to make a choice... just make it harder. My original idea was for this effect, combined with the gender-morphing, post-conception changes of MRS, to provide more balance in the decision making process of men entering into sexual relationships with women. Well, that was going to be the "intelligent" reason anyway. Just to give one, simple example: would the "one night stand" become a thing of the past? Would there come a point when men, accepting the changes wrought by MRS, only entered into sexual relationships for what society (and presumably this "intelligence" at the wheel) considers the "right reasons." Also, I didn't envision the "addiction like affect" lasting beyond the completion of the sex change - it's only purpose was to make the total "MRS" change more likely.
Anyway, all of this could have been worked into the story... but I was hoping I could get away with a quick ending. I can see that it didn't quite work, but I'm pleased that it (at least) merited a little discussion.
Sorry about all of the punctuation. I go a little crazy with the ,;/-...() when I'm tired. I really should have waited until morning. I'm sure to re-read this later and wonder where my mind was...
Above all, thanks for taking the time to comment. One thing this exercise has taught me... the value of a well considered comment. I hope I'm up to the challenge of reciprocation in the future... that I can give as well as I've received (and I mean that in a good way ;).
I liked it...
but I kind of got lost somewhere along the way. Still, "I liked it" is a positive thing.
D. D. Weldons
Sir, this is most
Sir, this is most confusing.
In the beginning you signed yourself as 'Myself.'
But now you signed off as 'The End'.
Is this some kind of gender bending?
Anyway, thanks to your warning i want you to know that one bastion of supreme maleness still stands.
And our new kilts are terrific.
Thanks again.
Yoron