Transgenderism Is a Mental Health Disorder

A word from our sponsor:

The Breast Form Store Little Imperfections Big Rewards Sale Banner Ad (Save up to 50% off)
Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Blog About: 

A lot of fairly nonsensical things were stated by the Republican presidential candidates in last night’s debate. Some were hateful, that concerned our community.

Vivek Ramaswamy repeated what he has said many times before that transgenderism is a mental health disorder. This is patently false and I’m sure he has been made aware what those with the capacity to know better have stated. The experts no longer view “transgenderism” as having a mental disorder and are working hard to eliminate that stigma. That task is made harder when people like the Republican candidates toss that red meat to their base.

As if that wasn’t ludicrous enough, Nikki Haley announced that the debate over whether transgender women and girls should be allowed to compete on sports teams alongside their cisgender peers the “women’s issue of our time.”

Really? Not abortion rights? Not equal pay and other economic justice? Not violence from intimate partners? Not the lack of women in leadership? Not racial injustice that places black women in severe adverse positions? I guess the exit polls for the election a few weeks ago that clearly indicated abortion rights to have been the “significant issue for women” have quickly become passe.

Even worse. . .according to Haley the transgender sports issue is somehow contributing to suicidal ideation in teenage girls. Nonsense! Unless she means that the unfairness of keeping transgender girls from competing against cisgender girls is a contributing issue, which is probably true but exactly the opposite of what Haley meant.

Haley, DeSantis, and Raviswamy all showed their cowardice when they refused to condemn Trump for his actions and non-actions on January 6th. They further displayed cowardice by selecting transgender youth as their target of choice, based on the feeble political power of that group.

They spoke many times of the grievous problem of gender surgery.

Transgender and non-binary people typically do not have gender-affirming surgeries before the age of 18. In some rare exceptions, 16- or 17-year-olds have received gender-affirming surgeries in order to reduce the impacts of significant gender dysphoria, including anxiety, depression, and suicidal tendencies. However, this is limited to those for whom the surgery is deemed necessary after discussions with both their parents and doctors, and who have been persistent in their gender identity for years, have been taking gender-affirming hormones for some time, who have undergone informed consent discussions and have approvals from both their parents and doctors, and who otherwise meet standards of care criteria.

Several of the candidates indicated their willingness to sign into law a ban on sex-affirming surgery for anyone under 21.

I’m ambivalent of anyone under eighteen undergoing surgery, just as I’m personally against abortion, except as a last step. However, I believe anyone who is old enough to serve in the army is old enough to decide if they should have surgery. I further believe exceptions do exist and patients, doctors and parents should have the right to decide.

All in all, it would be great if politics was the pursuit of a better life for all rather than a pursuit of power without regard for the cost.

Jill

Click Like or Love to appropriately show your appreciation for this post: