Conflict of interests

Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

This question is the result of my evening out with the 'original' Ginny and Kate last night. They are involved with a 'Reclaim the Night' group, and had a question that I would be interested in hearing some responses to.

The thing about the group is to march, at night, to show that women have a right to use the streets without having to be afraid of attack by men, in particular. The group contains a large number of rape survivors, and as can be imagined there is a bit of an edge as soon as men get involved. The women want to do their thing entirely as a group of women, with no men present.

Some of this comes down to fear, some of itto hatred (to be honest) and a lot of it to the same idea behind a cycling Critical Mass: only cyclists go on a CM because it is about cycling.

Some groups are perceived as men, some as women, and it is the perception of the bulk of the group which is the deciding factor.
Transmen are men.
Transwomen are women.
Crossdressers are men

I spoke to 'Kate' directly about the idea of M2F transgender people, and after I had dried my eyes at her reply* I agreed to ask here what form of words could possibly be used so as not to offend the men that are not wanted for the march. I should stress that there is no wish to refuse expressions of solidarity and support from anyone, just to try and keep the march entirely female.

I will not offer my own opinion on the request.

*"But I have always related to you as a woman, Steph"

Click Like or Love to appropriately show your appreciation for this post: