Rules

I've had a head cold the last few days so I read the Hunger Games trilogy.

1.) What's with the present tense? The author evidently thought it would heighten our intimacy with the narrator. Has anyone ever verbally told you a story in present tense? I don't think so. After a bit my mind simply ignored it and changed everything to past tense.

2.) Why did every line of dialogue have an attribution? You have a two-person scene, after one person talks and you have a new paragraph, it's obvious that another person is speaking. Since there's only two it has to be. . . . Again my eye simply glossed over the attributions after a bit.

3.) It is an unwritten rule that a paragraph will only have the words, thoughts, and actions of a single character. Not in these three books. Sometimes it became very confusing because of the mangled mess the author made of this simple rule.

4.) "In an attribution it is best to put the verb after the noun," my teacher said. Although other best sellers seem to go about fifty/fifty on this you have to wonder why. To test why this is so, try substituting other verbs for "said" when you place the verb first. "This pizza is tasty," belched Tom.

5.) Character growth is essential to a story. These books started out with admirable characters who either maintained a shred of their dignity or fell apart. In the end I had much less respect for the main character than I did in the first chapter. Why did she "settle" for the life in 12 and why didn't she at least give Gale a chance? Her definition of love became more and more confused as the story went on. IN the beginning she loved her sister enough to give up her own life to save her. In the end she simply loved the one who gave her the best chance to survive.

6.) What the hell does Young Adult mean anymore? Not even five years ago the list of things you couldn't do in a YA novel was lengthy . . . and for good reason. The main character starts out at 16. Rule of thumb is children read books about character three years older than themselves. The only redeeming message in this book is its condemnation of war. Is it really necessary to subject 13-year olds to a view of life that's so nihilistic. The Harry Potter series tore down some ethical barriers in its later books that probably should have remained intact. Hunger Games violated basic human dignity. I wonder how many schools will allow it in the junior high libraries?

7.) For gosh sakes . . . how many characters do you think the gentle reader can keep straight in their minds? How many characters can have the same letter starting their name? I could't even count all the "C" characters, let alone remember which person had done what. In the end the author just willy-nilly killed off people just to drive home the point that War is Hell. We got that message in the first chapter. If you counted each of the 14 areas within the country as a character, which they plainly were, the number of personalities to keep track of had to be around fifty.

All in all the author is a master of the cliffhanger and had a plot that was captivating. The story borrowed heavily from pop TV shows Survivor, Project Runway, and American Idol. If you like reality TV, you'll love the Hunger Games. At one point one of the main characters seeks sanity by playing Real of Not Real with his closest friends. Oh really. Don't tell me American Idol is scripted. The author also should pay royalties to Dr. Seuss.

Yes. . . I would recommend the trilogy to other adults. . .as popcorn literature and not as a primer on writing. I'll go to the movies, because my spouse is a big fan.

Once again . . . write for yourself, because trying to be a Good writer is a moving target.

Jill MI
Angela Rasch

Click Like or Love to appropriately show your appreciation for this post: