Breaking out of the box

A word from our sponsor:

The Breast Form Store Little Imperfections Big Rewards Sale Banner Ad (Save up to 50% off)

Yes, amazingly enough, I've posted two entries in one day. Don't worry, Erin, this will be it for now.

I've read a lot of arguments on one side or the other of the "Plotter vs. Pantser" debate, and so far, they've only served to increase my frustration.

Each side has valid arguments. The trouble is, I've tried both approaches, and get equally bogged down with each one--just in different ways.

If I go the "Plotter" route, "preparation paralysis" sets in (a wonderful phrase I picked from the myriad books on writing I've read so far). I try so hard to get the characters and plot fully fleshed out from the beginning that I freeze and nothing gets done.

Yet if I go the full "Pantser" route, I end up wandering so far from the original point of my story that I...well, freeze and nothing gets done.

The only thing that has seemed to work for me so far is the 500-word stories I do for the Mixed Tape.

Why? Perhaps because the pressure is off--I don't have to worry over developing a story or its characters beyond one simple scene, and can get away with giving the readers only as many details as absolutely necessary. Not as much research is required, since I'm not having to create a complex world for my characters to inhabit. Just set up a quick conflict, and resolve the conflict in 500 words or less.

I enjoy writing the shorter stories, but I feel a bit like a racehorse that's been hobbled. I'd love to break loose and show what I can do, but don't know how to do it without paralysis setting in once again.

I'm leaning more toward the "Pantser" direction, because that at least ensures I get something written, even if it rambles all over creation. That said, I'd like to ask the self-professed "Pantsers" here to advise me on how to avoid letting my stories wander too far afield.

Click Like or Love to appropriately show your appreciation for this post: