"That which we call a rose.....

A word from our sponsor:

The Breast Form Store Little Imperfections Big Rewards Sale Banner Ad (Save up to 50% off)

..... by any other name would smell as sweet."

But would it? Did The Bard get it wrong? Or did Juliet rather, for it would be a cardinal sin to ascribe to a writer the sentiments uttered by a character.

Randalynn included in her typically generous comment on 'The Old Alhambra' the thought, "none of the characters have a name, just a role they play in the unfolding drama. The result is an element of distance that leaves all of us us both enmeshed in the tale and yet far enough away from the story to wonder what the mystery is, and where events will take us." Now it is true that the characters are not named and that such was deliberate, but I had not thought it through with as much insight as Randalynn.

But her comment got me thinking about the question of names and their importance, and how perhaps the answer to Juliet's rhetorical "What's in a name?" should perhaps be "A lot." (The more literary minded critics here will have perhaps by now discerned why Shakespeare is not really challenged by my deathless prose.)

I take great care in the selection of names. I try to fit them to characters or use them as indicators of character's social and/or educational standing.

I found de Messembry on a 13th century tombstone in a ruined Northumbrian abbey. Agonised at length before fitting Grace to it. And I always referred to her in full as Grace de Messembry. David, Anne, Emma were easy simple names. Those in authority at Helgarren were more unusual, distant.

My favourite name is in a short story, not yet posted. Joanna Pennydugs for an old, well established, witch who has but a couple of mentions. This was a reverse process in that the name came to me in the nearest I will ever get to a flash of inspiration and I have since spent some time in tryong to analyse why it works. I have finally worked out that it has the same resonance as Jemima Puddleduck whilst my character is about as distant as possible from that delightful soul.

It was in that same story that I also discovered, by pure chance, the advantages of not giving names to characters. At least not until it served the writer's purpose. There the plot demanded it but nevertheless I realised that it was information that could be given at the writer's choosing and for effect. That the timing of it's disclosure is a useful weapon. This is exploited in 'The Old Alhambra'

I just wondered what others think.

Have I just become obsessive and possibly mad, or are names with all their magnificent diversity and nuance a delight widely shared?

Hugs,

Fleurie

Click Like or Love to appropriately show your appreciation for this post: