Disappointed

A word from our sponsor:

The Breast Form Store Little Imperfections Big Rewards Sale Banner Ad (Save up to 50% off)
Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

I'm disappointed in the resignation of New York Governor Eliot Spitzer.

In conjunction with a currently serialized story, another reader posted the following comment:


THE smoking gun website has 6 pages of the federal release of how the day went, so parts could be really accurate and the rest artiste's license.

As a sanctimonious prig going after the prostitutes he does not himself patronize, I have no mercy at all for the new york governor.

Rather than respond inline with it, I figured I'd better move it here instead.

I'm really sorry to see Eliot Spitzer resign. I liked the guy. I think he gave up too easily and should have fought it.

I mean, compare this scandal to any of the recent Republican scandals. It's certainly no worse. Idaho Senator Larry Craig decided not to resign, and he already pleaded guilty to the charge. Not only that, in denying the charge in public after signing the plea agreement, he's arguably in contempt of court, since he swore not to do that.

Craig is from an extremely conservative state and was caught in the act doing something anathema to his constituents, which has made him a laughing stock nationwide. Spitzer is from an arguably liberal state and was caught, ummm... what? Moving his own money to a classy escort/callgirl service for a private session, indoors, with a member of the opposite sex, somewhere nice. He wasn't actually caught in the act by a vice cop.

Compared to Craig's gay sex solicitation in an airport bathroom, why is this even considered half as bad?

Both men are married, so that cancels out as a factor. Even if you count both men as hypocrites, that cancels out. I don't count the hypocrisy as equal, however. Spitzer prosecuted two prostitution rings while he was a public prosecutor. If he wanted to be a crusader about it, there would have been dozens more. (You ever look at the sex-worker ads in the back of the Village Voice?) These were just jobs he had to do as part of his position, and couldn't very well avoid. Craig, on the other hand, did everything he could to badmouth gay and trans people, to restrict their rights and even to try to take away basic human rights already granted.

Spitzer is a rich dude. He was spending his own money on this vice of his. Compare that to some of the recent Republican scandals, where lobbyist money was used. Compare it to Rudy Giuliani's use of City property for his assignations with girlfriends, and the number of divorces, and the lobbyist favors he accepted.

Mrs. Spitzer has got to be humiliated by this whole thing, but reports have her as having urged her husband NOT to resign. I think that if he'd have followed her advice, he'd have gotten through this.

I'm disappointed. Not in Spitzer's pecadillos. Not in his expensive tastes or how free he is in spending his money. No. I'm disappointed in his resignation.

More than that, though, I'm scared. I still don't understand the whole logic for why the feds decided to wiretap him and trace his financial transactions. The supposed "trigger" for this that I've read in the paper just doesn't make sense. They supposedly picked him up on a routine money-laundering protocol, during a bank transfer to a corporate account. Wall Street and their friends in Washington desperately, desperately wanted to catch him doing something corrupt, after the grief and embarrassment he caused them when he was NY Attorney General.

Firstly, normally a wire transfer won't even trigger that protocol. It's designed to catch movements of large wads of currency.

Secondly, it's clear this was a fishing expedition. They were hoping to catch him taking money for political favors. Obviously, not only did they have no valid cause, but that was a false hope. As it turned out, all he was doing was paying his own money for favors of a different kind.

Yes, paying for sex is illegal, but not normally something the Attorney General of the United States gets personally involved in. This was a witchhunt, People, and the real scandal isn't what Eliot was doing in the Mayflower Hotel with a woman not his wife, it was the array of power used by the Administration to catch him.

And what was up with those first day headlines? "Governor Involved In Prostitution Ring!" Dan Savage, the sex advice columnist, my favorite person when it comes to sexual perspectives, astutely asked*, "What does that mean? I want to know how he was involved. As a customer, an admistrator, or a prostitute?"

In all of this, that's the only legitimate laugh line. The rest, I find scary as hell.

*[forgive the paraphrasing -- i don't have the exact quote handy.]

Click Like or Love to appropriately show your appreciation for this post: