Paper Versus Screen

I think I've posted a blog asking this same question in the past, but I can't remember and I can't find it, so I'll just go ahead and do it again.

How many people here prefer writing their stories by hand before taking them to the screen?

For me, writing by hand and writing on my computer are two very different experiences, and depending on the story I'm writing I'll do either one or the other almost exclusively.

For example, my very first story I posted to BC, Echoes, was started in paper format. I began writing it at a time I didn't even have a computer available worth using (all the way back before going to college and discovering BC, even,) and up until about the point I introduce Miriam's parents the entire story was kept in a notebook by my bed. After that point, though, I began writing the story pretty exclusively on PC, since that was about the time I got my very own compy for college.

With "The Tree," "Oh, Cheers," and even a few of my other shorts, I continued to use the handwriting method of getting my stories down, since it was the most convenient method if I wanted to do any writing while, say, at work.

Then there are other stories of mine that have taken a completely different path.

PFH has from the beginning been pretty much exclusively compy-based. The same can be said of "The Right Hand of the Devil," my Josie's Con stories, and quite a few of my drabbles. Switcheroo, Pickles, and even Boys of Summer all started out with a few pages of handwritten text, but quickly were converted over to digital-only, and the same can be said of just about anything that's been featured in one of my "Snippets" pieces.

Slowly but surely, I'm starting to piece out how much different each method of writing makes a piece feel, at least to me.

Things I write on PC first and foremost tend to feel a lot more dry than my stories I do by hand. It's not that they're more stilted, per se, but there's a different personality to the text and flavor than there is to things I write by hand. I tend to treat a lot of the elements of the stories more critically as well, judging and adjusting things as I go along. This is part of the reason I have so much trouble finishing things I write on PC -- it's so easy to go back and redo things, or abandon it entirely, that I too often give in to the urge to do so.

Writing by hand, however, tends to produce looser stories for me. Their plots usually aren't as deep as the things I try and do on my keyboard, and usually fall more into the daydream or fantasy side of things than my computer stuff. On the other hand, I also have more of a tendency to take an idea to, if not completion, than at least a point where I can judge whether to keep it or discard it, when I write by hand. Stories flow more easily, and develop their own personalities more quickly as well, since I'll often adjust my handwriting slightly to fit how the story feels to me. "Oh, Cheers" was written largely in bold-set print, while "The Tree" used some of my most florid cursive, since that seemed to help me focus on the airy and flowing elements of that story better. Taking them from paper to screen usually involves a bit of editing and reworking, but they still will usually end up feeling more organic to me than my digital-only stuff.

Does this kind of dichotomy (hoping I'm using that word right) pop up in many of your own stories depending on how you write them? Or is this just me being weird?

I'm asking partly because I've found myself writing mostly by hand the last few days, so I'm interested in seeing how other people feel about it.

Melanie E.

Click Like or Love to appropriately show your appreciation for this post: