According to some accounts, the traditional English translation of Genesis 2 misrepresents the text. There is a school of thought that the original human was neither male nor female, but asexual or a hermaphrodite. It's even thought the name "Adam" is derived from the initial Hebrew letters of the four compass points. At some later stage, this being was split into two, creating the two genders (apparently forming the woman from the side indicates she's his equal; as opposed to taking material from the head [ruler] or his foot [slave]). This interpretation makes sense in the context of the later passage which talks about procreation recreating the singular being: "the man clings to his wife, and they become one flesh."

Unfortunately, it didn't take long for religious leaders to forget the equality bit - and indeed early Christian leaders went to the extreme of naming the snake "Heva", and asserting that Eve was responsible for tempting Adam and getting kicked out of the Garden as a result (whereas apparently Genesis 3 explicitly states they were kicked out not because they ate the fruit, but to prevent them eating the fruit of the tree of life, thereby granting them immortality).

-oOo-

But however you interpret it, chances are it was written entirely by human hands several thousand years ago, and in all probability, the contents were neither dictated by the deity nor spoken to the writers with the instruction to "rewrite this in your own words".