Arthurs Round Table Identified?

Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7883874/Historians-locate-Ki...

Historians claim to have identified the site of the Round Table of King Arthur, at a site near Chester. A recently uncovered collesium like structure is believed the be the fabled location. It could seat about 1,000 people, nobles and retainers mostly, and would have been an assembly area for preparing for war. Thought it was interesting since there has been some interest in Ancient Briton and associated areas.

See link above for more.

Comments

Do I Smell a New TS/BC Project?

WOW!

Maybe I should write Persephone and inform her we have a new project for Elva Gunnarson to work on. Perhaps she can dig up some new dirt, (pun intended), on 'Lady' Guinevere.

Nancy Cole
www.nancycole.org

Nancy_Cole__Red_Background_.png


~ ~ ~

"You may be what you resolve to be."

T.J. Jackson

Yes Please

Mint-green is my favourite colour.

Then there's always 'Chain male' (ooh, kinky!)

Susie

The round table

I thought the round table was at Anne Boleyn's house, least that's what they told us when we went there.

Ye live an' learn, don'tcha?

Jessica
I don't just look it, I'm totally into all that Merlin and King Arthur stuff

When I was at school…

…and visited Winchester Cathedral on one of those wonderful “school trips” that we all loved so much, I am sure we were told that the ginormous “dart board-like thingy” hanging on one of the walls was King Arthur's round table.

Have I lived my life under a sad misapprehension? Hmmm…

Gabi.


“It is hard for a woman to define her feelings in language which is chiefly made by men to express theirs.” Thomas Hardy—Far from the Madding Crowd.

Gabi.


“It is hard for a woman to define her feelings in language which is chiefly made by men to express theirs.” Thomas Hardy—Far from the Madding Crowd.

King Arthur

OK, can someone help me? How much of this King Arthur story is true? Last week I walked in on the young women I am visiting as they were watching "King Arthur" the Movie, with Sean Connery, and Julia Ormond. (1995). Well, Sean Connery in that movie just makes me puddle up, GASP ! Though I hear that in real life, he is a bastard to women. :( I was so shattered when King Arthur walked in on his wife and L ! How could she !!!

So, how much of the history surrounding the movie is fact? Wasn't burning his body on a boat a Nordic custom? So far, my internet searches seem to be indicating that this was not real history, and I find this profoundly disappointing.

Much Peace

Khadijah Gwen

Arthur is mostly legend

erin's picture

A mixture of native Celtic myths, imports from the Roman empire and later additions, Arthur may also have a historical basis. Some warleader or king, possibly named Artorius Rigotamos, may have pulled the Romanized Celts together after Rome left and apparently was slain by treachery in battle but the nearest written history of this man is 100 years after the facts. Rigotamos is a title meaning High King.

Some of the least likely details of Arthur's story match up closely with similar legends from the Ukraine, and Scythian mercenaries were known to have been part of the Roman forces in Britain. That's weird, huh?

Other parts of the stories appear to have been grafted on later. Galahad is a German legend (Harold), probably added by the Saxons. The Welsh monks of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries loved the stories of Arthur and most likely contributed a lot of the elaborations until the modern fantasists got busy. :)

Hugs,
Erin

= Give everyone the benefit of the doubt because certainty is a fragile thing that can be shattered by one overlooked fact.

= Give everyone the benefit of the doubt because certainty is a fragile thing that can be shattered by one overlooked fact.