Author:
Taxonomy upgrade extras:
Ha! I knew that would bring the geeks in! Sorry, though. This isn't about computer failure, it's about societal failure.
There's a wonderful discussion going on now in Nick B.'s blog on what it means to be a transsexual. Nick's goal is to publish an article on the 'net that will help dispel ignorance and help promote acceptance.
The root problem, as I see it though, is society's current binary view of gender. It's a rigid view, much of it promoted by religions, who point to their holy books as arbiters of all things, and only choose to read and interpret certain verses in doing so.
A few years ago, I happened to be reading an article in an English newspaper having something to do with religion, and I noticed a sidebar listing all the major religions and denominations in the U.K. Wondering how they would describe various religions in general and my own Judaism in particular, and so I could compare to the U.S., I started clicking on everything and reading the descriptions. When I got to the Quakers, I was suddenly stunned. Here was a religion that seemingly believed in the equality of all people, didn't proselytize that they were the only real, or best religion, and claimed to recognize, and celebrate, the inner spirit of every person, regardless of... pretty much anything!
Okay, before anyone gets too uncomfortable, I'm about to get off the subject of religion and back to the topic. I just have to make one more point. I'll get there in a sec. I checked them out, found a Meeting in my neck of the world, read their Faith and Practice, which is sort of an operating manual for the religion, and just started crying. They welcome all. Straight, gay, transgendered, interracial, everyone. They clearly state that all religions offer a path to spirituality, and they celebrate the spirituality of all people, no matter their method of worship. They not only support gay marriage, they perform them, although our state doesn't recognize them. I felt these people not only represented my views, but I wanted to join them, and support them. In a world of what I viewed (from my limited viewpoint, and I've since learned better) as Christian hostility, bigotry and homophobia, these people were a shining beacon. Later, studying about my new religion, I realized that I'd gone from being the target of antisemites to joining one of the most persecuted Christian denominations in the post-Medieval period. Well, at least I maintained one thread of my heritage. :)
Back to the subject. Fundamentalists, and secular society at present, want to divide all people into two genders. Despite the fact that the Bible says that God created everything and everyone, this seems to be too inconvenient for the prejudices of many Christians, and they judge people who don't fit neatly into these two preconceived categories quite harshly.
The root of the problem is this binary gender model. It fails the reality test. If it could be made to go away, then many related problems would go away, too. Our homophobic society has made great strides in accepting gays over the last couple decades, but still has miles to go. Transsexuals are slowly receiving more recognition and acceptance. Male crossdressers, especially straight ones, are still firmly in the closet. And, intersexed babies are still victims of medical assault without consent, which too often ruins lives because the doctors can't guess the mind of an infant, and randomly assigning a body won't change the mind if you guess wrong.
This binary failure is most obvious and undeniable when it comes to these people who are intersex (IS), or in current terminology, the victims of a Disorder of Sex Development (DSD), a prenatal condition in which something happens to prevent normal development as a 46XX female or a 46XY male. It turns out there are dozens of conditions that can interfere with this, and a larger-than-you-might-imagine number of children are born with some degree of ambivalence in their sex organs or hormonal makeup.
Up until recently, the medical profession attempted to "sort this out" immediately after birth, using a fairly inefficient and barbaric protocol, which guessed wrong sometimes more than half the time, depending on which disorder caused the problem.
We TG folks, TS and CD alike, need to band together, not for our own rights, but to gain recognition for these physically non-conforming people, intersex people who are undeniably the way they are because that's how they were born, that's how God made them. In my opinion, they are the clearest argument against a societal binary model of gender, and an exception that, if accommodated, will make the M/F dichotomy on public records and in public life, an archaicism. Once that strict binary view of gender is forced to accept an exception, it will begin to crumble, and I think our lives will become better, too.
Comments
Well said
And the proliferation of the computer (or rather the system designers) has a lot to answer for. Try answering anything other than 'M' or 'F' for sex (!) and it most likely won't compute.
I may be wrong, but I believe that there is one large country in the world where you may answer 'sex' with an 'I'.
Heck, we've not got Mr, Mrs, Miss and Ms completely sorted out yet. What's wrong with 'Other' as a title? If you're a professor or a reverend, you might get away with it - depending upon how well the data input form was designed.
Susie
Title Field
Funny you should mention that because today at work we had a a new client who's a Marquess and insisted on his aristocratic title being included in our client recording system. Funnily enough, Marquess doesn't feature in our list of about a dozen titles, so the social worker tried adding "Marquess of X" to the end of his surname. Unfortunately, parts of our client recording system throw a wobbly if the entire name (including title) is more than thirty characters long. With the "Marquess of X" suffix, his was forty two...
-oOo-
I suppose a fair amount of the problems associated with data input forms is that it's far easier to code a solution that will work relatively well for the majority than will work well for everybody. Although it would be useful for people whose sex/gender identity doesn't fit into the neat moulds society expects to have an "Other" field for gender, sadly it would probably cause a data processing nightmare when weeding out the idiots who abuse the facility and write something like "Smurf" (c.f. the last UK census, when the ability to manually specify religion was seen as an opportunity for a few thousand individuals to write "Jedi"). I suppose what they could do instead would be to just have the two boxes on the form, but provide a Notes field somewhere on the form for additional explanatory information, together with a 'flag' tickbox next to each field, so staff receiving the form can see which question the user-defined notes apply to.
Computers (and I suppose to a slightly lesser extent humans) tend to have an aversion to continuous data, preferring instead to treat it as discrete - in as few 'parcels' as possible. In a way, that's probably also why some parts of the world cling rigidly to imperial weights and measures - they tend to be more tangible units than metric. For example, 5'10" tall is an easier concept to grip than 178cm; and if you haven't got a ruler handy you can make a (bad) guesstimate of length by using (real) feet.
One thing that separates all of us in this community (both T* and non T*) from the majority of the public is that we're willing to break out of the mould, look at issues in shades of grey (or even full spectrum colour) rather than black and white, and form our own opinions rather than let ourselves be spoon fed from the media (of which, sadly, the most consumed sections of which are often the most sensationalist).
As for gender/sexuality, as I've mentioned a few times in the past, I believe it's a complex web/network of many different factors, including karyotype, genotype, phenotype, mannerisms, clothing choice, hairstyle and probably at least a dozen other factors. Then take a similar web/network for the kind of person you're sexually / romantically attracted to. Of course, trying to describe where in the web / network you are (although some aspects are fixed, others may vary from time to time) would be very difficult, so again we're back to the label situation, but hopefully we're able to describe ourselves in more verbose terms than the default labels, which would afford a truer / more accurate picture.
Anyway, I think that's quite enough waffling on for now!
There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary and those who don't...
As the right side of the brain controls the left side of the body, then only left-handers are in their right mind!
Sixteen or so
Since there are only a bit over a dozen holders of the title living at the moment, and several of those may have higher titles, it is kind of presumptuous of him. But if a peer can't be allowed a bit of presumption, what's an inherited nobility for? :)
Still, well-written software should be flexible enough to accommodate. The problem is usually in the specs the programmer was handed.
Have you ever read The man whose name wouldn't fit;: Or, The case of Cartwright-Chickering (Doubleday science fiction) by Theodore Tyler? It's about a similar case back in the days of punchcards. :) I read it years ago and it is quite funny.
Hugs,
Erin
= Give everyone the benefit of the doubt because certainty is a fragile thing that can be shattered by one overlooked fact.
= Give everyone the benefit of the doubt because certainty is a fragile thing that can be shattered by one overlooked fact.
I'll monitor...
I've scribbled down somewhere the database's ID number for the chap, so it'll be interesting to monitor the record over the next few days to see what happens with the name field. The database in question is a social care case management system built on top of an Oracle database; it's apparently used in over 40 local authorities, so I can't imagine the developers being very partial to an enhancement request for the benefit of one client / service user!
But clients aside, the really scary thing about the database is that about 45% of the helpdesk calls we get are for data amendments. Being a social care system, some records are locked once saved; while others have a 'Complete' option, so records can be saved then 'Completed' to lock them and update base data. Some assessments and all service package agreements have to be authorised by a manager before they're locked. We get requests to unlock / delete / amend records in all three situations - yup, sometimes records are saved and authorised by a manager before they realise they've made an error on their recording. Never mind assessments recorded on the wrong client, starting the wrong type of assessment, putting in the wrong cost, being handed a paper assessment to backload from 2 months ago, when there have been subsequent recordings loaded (the system expects assessments to be loaded sequentially, so one arriving out of sequence is a real pain to fix). In short, if they can screw up their recording, they will screw up their recording.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary and those who don't...
As the right side of the brain controls the left side of the body, then only left-handers are in their right mind!
That's nice, but it doesn't
That's nice, but it doesn't help those of us that want to enter N for sex.
I dare say it's binary everything...
...for many people, right or wrong; black or white; day or night; ignoring all the shades of grey, the twilight and the gloaming, and every question to which there is no single answer.
Cheers,
Puddin'
A tender heart is an asset to an editor: it helps us be ruthless in a tactful way.
--- The Chicago Manual of Style
-
Cheers,
Puddin'
A tender heart is an asset to an editor: it helps us be ruthless in a tactful way.
--- The Chicago Manual of Style
"Black and White" Thinking
This isn't a DSM IV or V level description, but I've read that "black and white" or maybe it should be "black or white" thinking is one of the characteristics of borderline personality disorder. Being unable to see things as anything other than totally right or wrong, etc. I wouldn't be surprised if such a thinking problem were a characteristic of various psych disorders.
Hugs and Bright Blessings,
Renee
Ready for work, 1992.
Hugs and Bright Blessings,
Renee
Media
They love to see the world in black and white, without (m)any shades of grey. A few months ago, a taxi driver from Cumbria went on a killing spree before shooting himself. The UK's most read tabloid newspaper (hint: rhymes with "fun") trawled through his life story, dragging up photos from childhood, trying to paint the picture that the warning signs had been there from an early age.
The same paper have also now been doing a similar dissection of the life of a "vice girl" who's apparently been associated with a footballer.
Welcome to the world of "Trial by tabloid" - if there's a high profile crime, the accused is typically painted as guilty by the press before they've even arrived at court. Then of course once they reach court, the first few days are spent with the prosecution case, so by the time the defence get around to their arguments, the media have lost interest. And several cases have collapsed because jurors were caught reading media / internet coverage of the case.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary and those who don't...
As the right side of the brain controls the left side of the body, then only left-handers are in their right mind!