Was and Were

They're not just used in passive constructions but also to indicate continuing actions and states of being. In most uses, they tend to distance the reader from the action. Sometimes you want that effect for the purposes of the narrative. Consider these constructions:

"I was cleaning my gun when someone knocked on my door."
"While cleaning my gun I heard a knock on my door."

They're going to have different effects on the narrative, you might want one effect more than the other.

Generally, if you get rid of was and were, you are forced to use a more vivid or active verb to carry the action of the sentence. It's a mental trick to get into the scene and it works on both reader and author.

When I finish a story, I do a search for was and were (and if I find a lot of them for be and been, too). If I can eliminate 3/4ths of the was/were constructions, especially the passive ones (Jill was hit), then I figure I've made an appreciable improvement in my ability to grab a reader. I try to avoid them while writing, too.

Using was and were is a natural way of speaking and a signal of oral storytelling, so don't disdain them completely, especially in dialog.

But here's another pair of sentences:

"The hills were a thousand different colors, all of them brown."
"Someone had painted the hills a thousand different colors, all of them brown."

Getting rid of the were in the first sentence caused me to come up with the active and vivid metaphor in the second one. That's the real value of searching out the was/were constructions and reconsidering them.

- Erin