Rush to Judgment

Why does everyone assume that Amy is raped at the end of the story. (See “I “Saw”That”) Is our society so depraved to assume that any kind polite man who offers help to the downtrodden is automatically a bad person. It is assumed that she would be raped because the scene closely resembles that of the beginning, the problem with making that leap is that both were polite.

Is being polite a crime? How about helping the homeless, so what if it was a girl, just because it was a girl doesn’t mean that she was raped by the man. Or is it that because Cornell raped a girl that they expect the same senseless suffering to be forced upon him/her as a punishment? Are we an eye for an eye society, do we force upon the guilty party the same fate that they brought on others even if it is grossly wrong and hateful?

I purposely left the ending to the story open ended like that so that the reader must draw their own conclusions. Does the fact that all of the commentors had the same idea for the ending say something about humanity as a whole. Has our society deemed that anyone can be a threat, no matter how they act or look or talk. Who is to say that she wasn’t taken to this man’s house where he cared for her and adopted her.

I will admit that this was a set up, to draw that emotion out. As for the demise of the monster (Cornell) who is to say he died, perhaps he has only been altered, maybe in the back of Amy’s mind, he is in there suffering for the rest of her life unable to do anything but watch.

The rush to judgment is what causes most of the pain in the world, from racism to sexism, anti —Semitism etc. I only hope that people would take the time to see the good in people instead of what they see on the outside. On the face of it, the mystery man may be a rapist, or he might be a devoted husband doing the right thing, or a man of g-d trying to help, or just a passer by doing the right thing just once. The point is we don’t know until after an event that shows us.

As children our parents told us not to judge a book by its cover, as teens were learned in school from Dr. King not to judge people by the color of their skin but by the content of their character and as reasonable adults we know not judge others just on the face of what they seem to be.

I would think that this group of all beings would be most sensitive to this ideal and its most ardent supporter. You aren’t guilty until proven so in court so why rush to judge based on what seems to be true and what doesn’t.

Maybe the man did rape Amy and shame on him if he does. But because it has yet to happen why vilify him? All I or anyone else can ask is that you merely judge only on the solid facts, not what seem to be true but may not be.

Remember that we are all human, and we all have feelings and regardless of what we look like, act like, dress like, or talk like we are all humans and I believe that at our core we are all good. So the perception of guilt and the rush to judgment serves only to hurt, not to heal. And after all, the goal of catching the so called bad man is to heal the wounds caused, not to tear them open and cause collateral damage!

Not saying, I’m just saying!
Nuke

Click Like or Love to appropriately show your appreciation for this post: