Difference between two descriptions of onesself

A word from our sponsor:

The Breast Form Store Little Imperfections Big Rewards Sale Banner Ad (Save up to 50% off)
Printer-friendly version

Author: 

What is the difference between someone who describes themselves as someone who loves to dress in womens clothes (me) and someone who describes themselves as someone who loves to dress as a woman ?!?!?

Please answer as a response to the blog and not a PM !!!

Comments

Very little

Patricia Marie Allen's picture

I think we all start out in denial. It's a part of coming to grips with who and what we are. However, we need to avoid the one size fits all idea that we are all really on the same path to the same destination.

As I've stated before, and it's not an original idea - I got it from someone else, gender is a spectrum. Masculine is on one end and feminine is on the other. Latching on to Carl Jung hypothesis that there is something masculine in every woman and something feminine about every man; no one is exactly at one extreme or the other. Just how far you are from the end that seems to be associated with your genitalia determines if you are transgender or not.

Think of it as a railroad line, with many stops along the way. We expect to find contentment some where near our end of the line. (Masculine for males and feminine for females.) When we find that we aren't really all that content, we can board the train and ride to another stop closer to the other terminus. Since there are infinite stops, that ride may not be a long journey, or it might be worlds away from our starting point or anywhere in between.

Where ever that is, we may find contentment there. Sometimes that contentment is transitory. After being there for a while, we may find we're not as content as we thought we were, but only less discontent than before. So we get back on the train and travel some more to a stop that seems as if it's the stop that will give us contentment. Some of us do this multiple times before we find that elusive contentment. Yet others of us will find that we've stayed on the train a stop or two too long and need to get on the train heading the other way. In the end, those of us who don't despair and throw ourselves in front of an actual train, eventually find the stop where were are content. For some of us that takes a lifetime.

Wearing women's clothes and dressing like a woman are in reality so similar that there really is not any perceptible difference. There is a difference in dressing in women's clothes/dressing as a woman and living like a woman. The first two are in the same neighborhood and don't require a real move to go from one to the other. Where as living like a woman requires a commitment to the lifestyle.

If I haven't confused you enough, ask me another question and I'll try again.

Hugs
Patricia

Happiness is being all dressed up and HAVING some place to go.
Semper in femineo gerunt
Ich bin eine Mann

I would argue it's a difference of perspective on the end goal.

"Someone who loves to dress in women's clothes," to me, ties no aspect of gender of the wearer themselves into things. It describes, to me, someone who isn't worried about 'passing,' about behavior or about how the clothes reflect on who they are and how they should act.

"Someone who loves to dress as a woman," on the other hand, has a subtly different connotation. It describes a desire for the end goal to be an appearance that matches the appearance norms of one sex rather than the other, and would more easily equate to changes in behavior in order to enhance their illusion.

Most drag queens are "someone who loves to dress in women's clothes." Most. Their goal isn't to pass AS women, but to use those clothes as part of an expression of their aspect of masculinity: it might not be stereotypical masculinity, but it is nevertheless part of what they consider an inherently male persona. While this can change over time, I knew several drag queens at one time who would dress up to go out most nights, and were 'queens,' but had no qualms about trying to truly pass or about being happily gay men. They liked the trappings and sexuality associated with the clothes, but didn't care about the gender expression often tied to them.

I would argue the second description is more appropriate for the majority of the people who visit here, with its association of reverence for/admiration of the gender the clothes are typically identified with, and its connotation that those associations hold more significant meaning than simply something that makes you look or feel attractive. For many transwomen -- whether they desire to transition or not -- those inherent aspects, not of sexuality, but of *femininity,* are very important. What you're wearing isn't about being a man in women's clothing, but about being a woman in the eyes of the world around you. To me, that speaks more of a desire to embrace not just the physical trappings, but many of the societal ones of the role as well.

To stick with the drag queen angle here:

When I think "someone who loves to dress in women's clothes," I think of Hugo Weaving in 'Priscilla: Queen of the Desert,' sitting in the hospital in a massive chandelier gown and smoking a cigar. When I think "someone who loves to dress as a woman," I instead think of Patrick Swayze in 'To Wong Foo,' wherein his character is doing more than just wearing the clothes, but embracing a great number of other elements they feel are inherent trappings of the feminine state. It's an OVERSTATED version of femininity, to be sure, but it's as much part of their dressing up as the clothes themselves.

Of course, none of this is limited to MEN in women's clothing.

There are plenty of women I know who love to wear pretty clothes, but don't bother with all the other guff that goes along with it. My mom's makeup box includes eye shadows and blushers she's had since the mid-nineties and never uses. You wear hose because you don't wanna bother shaving your legs this week. You certainly don't bother to change your nail polish to match the outfit if it isn't already half chipped off. Never once in my family have I ever seen anyone smooth their skirt when they sat down, cross their legs at the ankle and kink their knees to the side. Matching your purse to your outfit? Why when you've been using the same brown bag with the nail polish down the side for ten years!

On the other hand, I've known plenty of women who loved to dress as women, go the full length with the hair and makeup and everything else. They would behave differently when dressed up, more femininely and often more demure, especially if they were dressed up for something like church or a wedding. The clothing was as much about the matching attitude as anything else.

And I don't think either of those ways of going about it are wrong.

Clothes are just clothes: it's what they mean to the wearer that changes their context. If I put Dwayne Johnson in a flirty little halter sundress he's not suddenly going to be a woman, or feel compelled to act like one. If I put Selena Gomez in a lumberjack outfit and glued a beard on her she's not going to miraculously start scratching herself in public and trying to pick up women at the local watering hole. The way we look at the things we wear, that context we apply TO wearing them, means a lot.

Right now I'm sitting at my desk wearing a tee and shorts. They're both pretty generic cotton, but yes, they came from the men's department. Underneath them I have on . . . well, you don't need to know the details of my undergarments, but they definitively did *not* come from the men's department. My legs are shaved, my hair is nice and soft and loose, and I'm considering doing my nails.

The clothes are MY clothes, and I am a woman. That makes them, for all intents and purposes, women's clothes, does it not? And if, when I eventually have a boyfriend, I decide it would be cute to wear one of his work shirts, rolled up and hanging loose on me, would that not still be me dressed as a woman?

It's all a matter of perspective.

Melanie E.

The Spectrum

I think Melanie has it dead right.
Drag queens dress in drag, rather than women's clothes, and do not pretend to dress as women. The purpose is the performance.
Transvestites dress in women's clothing, and may wear lipstick surrounded by a full beard. The purpose is sexual gratification.
Transwomen dress as women because that is what they feel they are. It has no purpose other than to reaffirm their sense of self.
But these are not boxes. It is a spectrum.
My thoughts anyway.
Maryanne