The Guild of Evil Blonde Proofreaders

It has occurred to me lately that there is a lot of variety of opinion on the objectives and duties of a proof reader.

Being of a somewhat older school (I won't say which or how old), I tend to rely on my recollections of what I learned in school and a specific 'Manual of Style' that I would consult more often if I could remember which box it's packed in.

I tend to concentrate on the spelling, grammar and construction and usually will only comment on a character or situation if asked by the author. I try to be careful to make sure that the story is faithful to the author's vision. (Compare the two versions of Grover's Strange Happenings in Ragnarok County.)

It seems from my reading others' comments that there is a lot of variation in the scope of proofing.

Is there an interest in opening a forum for proof readers to discuss the more mundane aspects of writing such as grammar, construction, etc.?

Are there others interested in affiliating themselves with the Guild of Evil Blonde Proofreaders?

Oh, you don't have to be blonde or evil... ;-) ...but it helps.

Janet

Mistress of the Guild of Evil Blonde Proofreaders