That's my preferred title, in that they're always wailing, moaning and gnashing their proverbial teeth. You could be forgiven for thinking their editor was Chicken Licken (of "The sky is falling!" fame)...

Anyone who's not in their target demographic is a potential target for their vitriol, while a few years back they seemed to be going through an oncology phase (frequently citing questionable research to argue that a variety of inanimate objects either cause or prevent cancer (handy summary here) - including the infamous "How using Facebook could raise your risk of cancer"; while more recently they've been moaning about the sexualisation of children and campaigning for ISPs to block pr0n by default... but strangely don't think there's anything wrong with the objectification of women on their own website (finding real news there's almost like finding the proverbial needle in a haystack in amongst all the commentary on celebrities lives, clothes and bodies). Oh, and last year they experimented with website polls - but quickly discovered that if you ask a leading question, quite a lot of people will turn up and vote for the 'wrong' option :)