Until they pulled the statistics out of the hat, then I lost it. What junk!

I think this article deserves a nice razzberry.

No surprises there from that cesspit. The usual bottom-feeder comments as well, and rabid 'red-arrow' treatment for anyone who tries to talk the TG case. In the middle of the green-ink rants is a comment that 'lazy public-sector workers' are targetting small children because they are less work than teenagers.

Edited to add: the line about children with 25-year-old transsexuals...what is the median age for nurses, or doctors? And all the usual conflation with sexuality. Having seen this story in both the Sun (a truly shitty paper) and the giveaway Metro, I see the Hate sneers at a deal with a tabloid newspaper. Two things: firstly, the press in the UK traditionally divides into two, the 'quality' broadsheets and the less elevated tabloids. The tabloids also have, at their lowest level, the redtops, like the Sun. The Hate Mail considers itself a broadsheet in all but physical size. What it means by 'tabloid deal' is simply that they didn't buy the story first, so they are shitting on the child--er, I mean, taking a principled stance to Protect Our Nation's Vulnerable Children.