Oral Sex linked to cancer

Printer-friendly version

Author: 

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

Is anything safe anymore? The good news - they didn't say it was fattening!

Check out the link below from the beeb.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6639461.stm

Angharad.

Comments

hrm

All i can say is... oh bugger.

I suspect somehow the christian right will find a way to link premarital sex to cancer next too...

or being near a tranny causes cancer!

Jokes aside... I smoke, I drink a little, and ive given oral sex (What can I say? its college)... oh shit.

Curious

Is Johns Hopkins some sort of ultra-conservative christian college or something? From what I read in the article it didn't really specify gender or sexual variances. I might of missed it... Just curious as to what christianity has to do with anything in regards to this article.

Lili

~Lili

Write the story that you most desperately want to read.

Well, Johns Hopkins ...

They stopped their transgender program, and the biggest dope is in charge of their surgical department. Remember he is they guy who wrote the article that my son sent me as "evidence" that T surgery was bad.

Oh, hey people. I really appreciated the support I got from you all. It kept me from really going down the slippery slope.

Gwendolyn

Um, I have a question!

Cancer for the performer or the recipient?

Signed,

A very worried guy.

-- snicker --

John in Wauwatosa

John in Wauwatosa

Both, I think

From the way the article read, it looks like both. So you're screwed John.

You have to take studies like this with a grain of salt (or in some cases the whole bag). It didn't give very many particulars other than to say it was a small study. There are too many variables to take into account with something like this. Live your life, everything in moderation, nothing in excess, and stay away from things that are just stupid (like smoking) and you'll stand a 'better' chance of living a healthy life. Note the quotes on 'better' nobody is immune from everything. There's no need to go paranoid over whether or not you should or shouldn't go down on your partner.

Lili

~Lili

Write the story that you most desperately want to read.

It only matters

if you're not the selfish kind, I guess.

Or maybe you're worried you gave too much.

Jo-Anne

Performer? Recipient?

Er. Which is which? No, never mind, I don't *need* to know.

Call me naive... *snicker*

- Moni

It's a girls' world; we just let boys live in it.

Johns Hopkins Credibility-NOT

Johns Hopkins Credibility-NOT
Once bogus, never to be trusted.
Once upon a time they had a TS program at Johns Hopkins, only the dirty little secret was the Dr in charge had his own agenda. It proved out that he did not believe SRS was a viable cure for transsexuality. He'd make the patients jump through hoops to get what they thought was a tangeble carrot only to be turned down for whatever shortcomings the good Dr could dream up. There were a lot of broken hearts and crushed dreams.
When they come up with a headline that oral sex causes cancer you have to wonder what drove that research?
So please, when this "trusted institution" makes a statement, take it with a grain of salt until someone with some credibility arrives at a similar conclusion.

No Offense,

and I might be reading the other comments wrong, but to me, the article said that a rare cancer is very often cause by Human Papaloma Virus. There is a vaccine for many of the strains of this virus.

If someone has an HPV infection then oral sex or possibly kissing might spread the virus to one's partner. It's just another disease that sometimes causes problems. It seems that other ways of getting one's sex juices to one's partner's face or mouth could also spread the disease.

Practicing HIV safe sex can just be modified a little, until both partners are tested for HIV and any other STD. I'm sure no one wants any of those diseases.

Hugs, Blessings and "be safe out there!"
Renee

Hugs and Bright Blessings,
Renee

Frankly

As news goes, that sucks.

A Potential Godsend!

...for Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil®, a quadrivalent HPV vaccine that would theoretically protect against throat cancer caused by this virus.

Current recommendations are for preteen girls to get vaccinated against HPV to protect them for a lifetime against this most common cause of cervical cancers. Now, it's clear that girls, gay boys, and even straight boys who might contract the virus by kissing girls who might contract the virus by oral sex, would also benefit by preventing a majority of throat cancers.

With this virus causing so much human misery, it's only a matter of time before the recommendation is that EVERY child get vaccinated against it, which if followed, could actually eradicate the virus in our lifetime, much as polio and smallpox were largely eradicated in prior generations due to vaccination programs.

The current opponents of the recommendation of vaccinating girls base their opposition on the canard that the act of vaccination is tantamount to a recommendation to begin sexual activity. Nonsense, obviously. Now that boys are potentially victims, and kissing is possibly a transmission vector, maybe the sexophobic troglodytes will come around to accepting the idea that HPV is a dangerous human disease, is preventable, that protecting life is more important than proselytizing preposterous dogma, and we ought to vaccinate our children to protect them.